检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王宪明[1] 姬泰然 Wang Xianming;Ji Tairan
出 处:《复印报刊资料(中国近代史)》2023年第12期3-12,共10页MODERN HISTORY OF CHINA
摘 要:针对英国“中国学者”蓝诗玲等所提出的历史上本无鸦片战争、鸦片战争系由20世纪20年代以后孙中山和中国共产党人所领导的中国革命意识形态构建而成等观点,论文从中国历史文献的战争命名法、19世纪中期历史当事人对鸦片战争的态度、清末民初中国历史教科书对鸦片战争性质及其严重后果的认识和评价等层面,批驳其观点的荒谬,揭示其对中国历史传统的偏见与无知,呼吁中外史学界认识这一问题的严重性,并共同努力,澄清错误观点,帮助各国人民更好地理解中国的历史文化。British"Scholars on China"such as Julia Lovell put forward the fallacy that there was no Opium War,which was constructed by Sun Yatsen and the Chinese Communists according to the revolutionary ideology since the 1920s.Against these arguments,this article researches how the wars were named in traditional Chinese histories,how the historical figures who had experienced the Opium War understood it,and the nature and catastrophic consequences of the Opium War revealed in the late Qing and Early Republican historical text-books,exposing the grievous mistakes in Lovell's works,which reflected her ignorance of the Chinese historiographical tradition.Both Chinese and foreign scholars should pay attention to this issue and refute the fallacy together.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.116.170