英国发动鸦片战争侵略中国的历史不容否定——驳英国蓝诗玲等人的荒谬观点  

The Fact of Britain Launching the Opium War to Invade China Cannot Be Denied:Refuting the Fallacy of British Scholars such as Julia Lovell

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:王宪明[1] 姬泰然 Wang Xianming;Ji Tairan

机构地区:[1]清华大学马克思主义学院,北京100084

出  处:《复印报刊资料(中国近代史)》2023年第12期3-12,共10页MODERN HISTORY OF CHINA

摘  要:针对英国“中国学者”蓝诗玲等所提出的历史上本无鸦片战争、鸦片战争系由20世纪20年代以后孙中山和中国共产党人所领导的中国革命意识形态构建而成等观点,论文从中国历史文献的战争命名法、19世纪中期历史当事人对鸦片战争的态度、清末民初中国历史教科书对鸦片战争性质及其严重后果的认识和评价等层面,批驳其观点的荒谬,揭示其对中国历史传统的偏见与无知,呼吁中外史学界认识这一问题的严重性,并共同努力,澄清错误观点,帮助各国人民更好地理解中国的历史文化。British"Scholars on China"such as Julia Lovell put forward the fallacy that there was no Opium War,which was constructed by Sun Yatsen and the Chinese Communists according to the revolutionary ideology since the 1920s.Against these arguments,this article researches how the wars were named in traditional Chinese histories,how the historical figures who had experienced the Opium War understood it,and the nature and catastrophic consequences of the Opium War revealed in the late Qing and Early Republican historical text-books,exposing the grievous mistakes in Lovell's works,which reflected her ignorance of the Chinese historiographical tradition.Both Chinese and foreign scholars should pay attention to this issue and refute the fallacy together.

关 键 词:鸦片战争 中国史学传统 “春秋为尊者讳” 

分 类 号:K092[历史地理—历史学] K253

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象