ChatGPT等生成式人工智能的刑法规制  

Criminal Law Regulation of Generative Artificial Intelligence such as ChatGPT

作　　者：麦买提·乌斯曼[1] Maimaiti Usman(Xinjiang Agricultural University,Urumqi 830052,China)

机构地区：[1]新疆农业大学法学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830052

出　　处：《湖北警官学院学报》2024年第3期41-54,共14页Journal of Hubei University of Police

基　　金：新疆维吾尔自治区人民检察院理论研究重点课题“提升检察机关司法工作人员相关职务犯罪侦办质效若干问题研究”(XJ2023A21)。

摘　　要：随着人工智能时代的到来,ChatGPT等生成式人工智能的横空出世引发了社会和经济领域的热议。但是,相比社会和经济领域对ChatGPT等生成式人工智能的敏锐关注,法学界特别是中国的刑法学界对ChatGPT等生成式人工智能的关注处于严重滞后的状态,即刑法学界对ChatGPT等生成式人工智能相关问题的思考大都是在其工具和技术本质的前提下展开,认为ChatGPT等生成式人工智能的独立刑法规制尚不具有现实性意义。然而,这些看法并未考虑ChatGPT等生成式人工智能必然会发展到智慧智能本质阶段。在智慧智能本质阶段ChatGPT等生成式人工智能的智慧化是必然的,极易引发违法犯罪。为此,刑法的保障功能不能减弱,刑法理论研究与ChatGPT等生成式人工智能发展之间不能出现脱节。同时,ChatGPT等生成式人工智能的刑法规制没有统一、普遍的标准,要以自身在不同阶段的本质特征为前提,即刑法在ChatGPT等生成式人工智能不同本质阶段的规制绝对不同。With the advent of the artificial intelligence era,the emergence of generative artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT has sparked heated discussions in the social and economic fields.However,compared to the keen attention paid by the social and economic fields to generative artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT,the legal community,especially the Chinese criminal law community,is in a serious lagging state of attention to generative artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT.That is to say,the thinking of the criminal law community on issues related to generative artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT is mostly based on its tool and technological essence,and it is believed that the independent criminal law regulation of generative artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT does not have practical significance.However,these views do not take into account that generative artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT will inevitably develop into the essential stage of intelligent intelligence.The intelligentization of generative artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT in the essential stage of intelligent intelligence is inevitable and can easily lead to illegal and criminal activities.Therefore,the protective function of criminal law cannot be weakened,and there should be no disconnection between criminal law theory research and the development of generative artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT.Therefore,there is no unified and universal standard for criminal law regulation of generative artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT,and it is necessary to take its own essential characteristics at different stages as a premise,that is,the regulation of criminal law in different essential stages of generative artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT is absolutely different.

关 键 词：生成式人工智能 刑法规制 智慧智能 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]