基于倾向评分匹配的经脐单孔与三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的临床疗效对比  被引量:3

Comparison of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy via umbilical single hole and three holes based on propensity score matching in the treatment of acute cholecystitis

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:李超[1] 朱丽丹[1] 汪宏[1] 吴光杨[1] LI Chao;ZHU Lidan;WANG Hong;WU Guangyang(Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Hernia Center,Hefei First People’s Hospital,Hefei 230061,China)

机构地区:[1]合肥市第一人民医院胃肠外科/疝中心,230061

出  处:《临床外科杂志》2024年第6期611-614,共4页Journal of Clinical Surgery

摘  要:目的探讨基于倾向评分匹配的经脐单孔与三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的临床疗效。方法2020年1月~2022年12月行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的急性胆囊炎病人106例,根据治疗方法不同分为两组,研究组64例,采用经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术,对照组42例,采用三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术。比较两组病人手术相关指标、术后恢复情况及术后并发症情况。结果两组体质量指数(BMI)、胆囊B超检查结果比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),研究组病人平均年龄大于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。将两组病人倾向评分匹配后的一般资料进行比较发现,两组性别、年龄、BMI、胆囊B超检查结果无明显差异(P>0.05)。研究组手术时间为(61.48±10.24)分钟,对照组为(40.42±8.35)分钟;研究组术后6小时、24小时的疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分分别为(5.63±1.04)分和(3.42±0.65)分,对照组分别为(7.22±1.61)分和(5.48±1.02)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组病人手术中的失血量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组的住院时间及肠胃功能恢复时间分别为(2.05±0.42)天和(33.46±4.30)小时,对照组分别为(3.95±1.02)天和(47.58±7.62)小时;研究组病人对切口瘢痕满意度评分为(4.58±0.42)分,对照组为(3.02±0.38)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组并发症总发生率为2.78%,对照组为16.67%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的术后疼痛感较三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术明显更低,住院时间及肠胃功能恢复时间更短,病人对切口瘢痕满意度的评分更高,同时术后并发症的总发生率更低。Objective To explore the comparison of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on propensity score matching through the umbilical single hole method and three holes method in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.Methods 106 patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were selected as research subjects.According to different treatment methods,they were divided into the study group(n=64)and the control group(n=42).The patients in the study group were treated with single port via umbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy,while the control group was treated with three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Compare the surgical related indicators,postoperative recovery,and postoperative complications between the two groups of patients.Results Comparing the general information of the two groups of patients,there was no significant difference in body mass index(BMI),BMI,and gallbladder ultrasound results(P>0.05),but the average age of the study group patients was greater than that of the control group patients(P<0.05).By comparing the general data of the two groups of patients after propensity score matching,it was found that there was no significant difference in gender,age,BMI,and gallbladder ultrasonography results between the two groups(P>0.05).The surgical time for the study group patients was(61.48±10.24)minutes,while for the control group,it was(40.42±8.35)minutes;And the visual analog scale(VAS)scores at 6 and 24 hours after surgery were(5.63±1.04)and(3.42±0.65)for the study group,respectively,while(7.22±1.61)and(5.48±1.02)for the control group.The pain sensation was more pronounced(P<0.05);However,there was no statistically significant difference in blood loss during surgery between the two groups of patients(P>0.05).The hospitalization time and gastrointestinal function recovery time of the study group patients were(2.05±0.42)days and(33.46±4.30)hours,respectively,while the control group was(3.95±1.02)days

关 键 词:经脐单孔 三孔 腹腔镜 胆囊切除术 胆囊炎 

分 类 号:R657.4[医药卫生—外科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象