检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张进帅 李金珂 ZHANG Jinshuai;LI Jinke(School of Law and Institute of Criminal Law Sciences,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学法学院暨刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875
出 处:《辽宁警察学院学报》2024年第4期89-96,共8页Journal of Liaoning Police College
基 金:北京市社会科学基金重点项目“轻罪治理中刑事司法问题与路径选择”(23FXA005);北京师范大学法学院2023年度学术型研究生专项科研基金课题“错误论的理论发展与实践运用”(2023LAW008)。
摘 要:随着认罪认罚从宽制度的践行进入纵深阶段,庭审的对抗性渐呈衰微之势,取而代之以控辩间更加鲜明的合意性,这意味着证据开示制度赖以存在的场域不复从前,不宜再以提高庭审过程的对抗性和实质化程度为目标进行相关研究。正是基于以上场域的微观变化,通过探索证据开示制度在当前协商性司法场域中的运行机制,对认罪认罚从宽制度下的证据开示制度进行架构形塑,以期在证据开示制度的助力下更加充分地发挥认罪认罚从宽制度的价值。With the practice of the plea and penalty leniency regime entering a deeper stage,the confrontational nature of the trial gradually decreases and is replaced by a more distinct consensual nature between the prosecution and the debate.This means that the field on which the system of evidence disclosure relies is no longer the former one,and it is not suitable to conduct related research with the goal of improving the confrontational and substantive degree of the trial process.It is on the basis of the micro-changes in the above fields,by exploring the operating mechanism of the evidence disclosure in the current consultative judicial field,the structure of the evidence disclosure under the plea and penalty leniency regime is shaped,so as to give full play to the value of the plea and penalty leniency regime with the help of the evidence disclosure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7