检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林兵 冯毅[2] LIN Bing;FENG Yi(Business School,Jiangsu Normal University,Xuzhou 221116,China;School of Management and Economics,University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,Chengdu 610054,China)
机构地区:[1]江苏师范大学商学院,江苏徐州221116 [2]电子科技大学经济与管理学院,四川成都610054
出 处:《工业工程》2024年第3期98-105,共8页Industrial Engineering Journal
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助项目(19BGL100)。
摘 要:该研究探讨供应链库存控制策略及生产协同重要性。将备货型生产(make-to-stock, MTS)与按订单生产(make-to-order, MTO)两级串联模式应用于高效响应性供应链的生产与库存联合控制问题并刻画其最优策略。针对订单到达服从泊松过程和生产时间服从指数分布情形,通过马尔科夫过程转移速率一致化技术建立起马尔科夫决策过程模型并得到相应贝尔曼最优方程。基于最优费用函数结构性质,将最优生产与库存控制策略刻画为依赖系统状态的基本库存策略。随后,将模型拓展到批量生产情形。数值算例验证了最优策略单调结构性质,给出不同情境下的最优策略绩效。同时将最优策略与两种常见策略进行比较。基础情境下,容限策略偏离最优7.36%,短视策略偏离最优25.73%。其他情境下,最优策略都明显优于另两种策略。This paper investigates inventory control strategies and the importance of production coordination in supply chains.We apply the two-stage tandem production mode of make-to-stock(MTS)and make-to-order(MTO)to the joint production and inventory control in efficient and responsive supply chains.Also,the optimal strategy is characterized.In cases where order arrivals follow a Poisson distribution and production time follows an exponential distribution,through the technique of rate uniformization for Markov process transitions,we formulate a Markov decision process(MDP)model and derive the corresponding Bellman optimality equation.Then,based on the structural properties of the optimal cost function,we characterize the optimal production and inventory control strategies as a basic inventory strategy dependent on system states.Subsequently,the model is extended for cases of batch production.Numerical examples verify the monotone structural property of the optimal strategy and further provide the system performance using the optimal strategy.In addition,we compare the optimal strategy with two other commonly used ones.In the baseline scenario,the capacity limit strategy deviates from the optimal one by 7.36%,while the myopic strategy deviates from the optimal one by 25.73%.In other scenarios,the optimal strategy remarkably outperforms the other two strategies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49