检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赖寒光 林先娘 吴海明[1] LAI Han-guang;LIN Xian-niang;WU Hai-ming(Sanming Second Hospital,Sanming 366000,China)
机构地区:[1]三明市第二医院,366000
出 处:《中国现代药物应用》2024年第12期77-79,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
摘 要:目的观察分析细菌定量计数联合尿沉渣白细胞检验在尿路感染诊断中的应用价值。方法200例疑似尿路感染患者,均接受细菌定量计数、尿沉渣白细胞检验及尿细菌培养。分析尿细菌培养结果,以尿细菌培养为金标准,比较细菌定量计数、尿沉渣白细胞单一检验及联合检验的诊断效能。结果200例疑似尿路感染患者经尿细菌培养诊断,阳性标本为104例,阳性率为52.00%。以尿细菌培养为金标准,联合检验对尿路感染的诊断敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值及阴性预测值分别为98.08%、96.88%、97.14%、97.89%,细菌定量计数检验对尿路感染的诊断敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值及阴性预测值分别为80.77%、69.79%、74.34%、77.01%,尿沉渣白细胞检验对尿路感染的诊断敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值及阴性预测值分别为91.35%、92.71%、93.14%、90.82%,联合检验对尿路感染的诊断敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值及阴性预测值均高于细菌定量计数检验,敏感性、阴性预测值高于尿沉渣白细胞检验(P<0.05)。结论在尿路感染诊断中,应用细菌定量计数联合尿沉渣白细胞检验的结果与尿细菌培养更相近,具有较高的诊断价值。Objective To observe and analyze the application value of quantitative bacterial count combined with urinary sediment leukocyte test in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection.Methods All 200 patients with suspected urinary tract infection were subjected to quantitative bacterial count,urinary sediment leukocyte test and bacterial culture of urine.The results of urinary bacterial culture were analyzed,and the diagnostic efficacy of quantitative bacterial count and urinary sediment leukocyte test alone and in combination were compared using bacterial culture as the gold standard.Results 200 patients with suspected urinary tract infection were diagnosed by urinary bacterial culture,and 104 cases were positive,with a positive rate of 52.00%.Using bacterial culture of urine as the gold standard,the diagnostic sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of joint test for urinary tract infection were 98.08%,96.88%,97.14%and 97.89%,respectively.The diagnostic sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of quantitative bacterial count for urinary tract infection were 80.77%,69.79%,74.34%and 77.01%,respectively.The diagnostic sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of urinary sediment leukocyte test for urinary tract infection were 91.35%,92.71%,93.14%and 90.82%,respectively.The diagnostic sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of joint test for urinary tract infection were higher than those of quantitative bacterial count test,and the sensitivity and negative predictive value were higher than those of urinary sediment leukocyte test(P<0.05).Conclusion In the diagnosis of urinary tract infection,the application of quantitative bacterial count combined with urine sediment leukocyte test is more similar to urine culture,and has high diagnostic value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.116.170