商标恶意诉讼的法律规制——基于《商标法修订草案(征求意见稿)》之相关规定  

Legal Regulation of Malicious Trademark Litigation:Based on Relevant Provisions of the Draft Amendment to the Trademark Law(Exposure Draft)

作　　者：孙琳凯 SUN Lin-kai(School of Law,Shandong University,Qingdao 266237,China)

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,青岛266237

出　　处：《山东青年政治学院学报》2024年第4期58-67,共10页Journal of Shandong Youth University of Political Science

摘　　要：商标领域的恶意诉讼是指一方当事人通过诉讼对抗另一方当事人以谋取不正当利益的行为,应按照侵权责任的一般构成要件来认定。其规制可从程序和实体两方面展开:一方面应完善不侵权确认之诉的程序,完善商标权诉前禁令制度,在实践中严格限制原告撤回起诉,加强庭前程序功能,发挥人民检察院在商标恶意诉讼领域中的法律监督作用;另一方面应确立针对商标恶意诉讼的民事反赔制度,对损害范围的认定应包括有因果关系的可得利益损失,在确定赔偿数额时结合案情判定适当的惩罚性赔偿。Malicious trademark litigation refers to the behavior of one party using litigation against another party to obtain illegitimate benefits,which should be identified according to the general elements of tort liability.Regulation can be carried out from both procedural and substantive aspects:on the one hand,it is necessary to improve the procedures for non-infringement confirmation lawsuits,enhance the pre-litigation injunction system for trademark rights,strictly limit the plaintiff’s right to withdraw lawsuits in practice,strengthen the functions of pre-trial procedures,and leverage the legal supervision role of the people’s procuratorates in malicious trademark litigation;on the other hand,a civil counterclaim system targeting malicious trademark litigation should be established.The scope of damages should include the loss of acquirable interests with causation.Appropriate punitive damages should be awarded when determining the amount of compensation in conjunction with the facts of the case.

关 键 词：商标恶意诉讼 不侵权确认之诉 诉前禁令 民事反赔制度 

分 类 号：D923.43[政治法律—民商法学]