民法典中债务加入与连带责任保证的区分及适用标准  

The Distinction and Applicable Standard of Debt Joining and Joint and Several Liability Guarantee in the Civil Code

作　　者：金丽[1] 王艾春 Jin Li;Wang Aichun(School of Marxism,Anhui Wenda Information Engineering College,Hefei 230000,China;Zhongdian Bo Microelectronics Technology Co Ltd,Hefei 230000,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽文达信息工程学院马克思主义学院,安徽合肥230000 [2]中电博微电子科技有限公司,安徽合肥230000

出　　处：《黑河学院学报》2024年第7期42-45,共4页Journal of Heihe University

基　　金：安徽省科重点科研项目“中国式法治现代化的本质要求和基本特征研究”(2023AH052813);安徽省优秀青年教师培育项目“金丽”(YQYB2023081);安徽省省级一般项目“中国共产党人的精神谱系融入‘思想道德与法治’课的实践研究”(2022jyxm624);安徽文达信息工程学院校级三全育人一般项目“新时代民办高校大学生劳动实践教育实施困境及对策研究”(SQYR2023B01);安徽文达信息工程学院校级一般项目“新时代奋斗幸福观融入高校思政课教学研究--以《思想道德与法治》课程为例”(SQYR2023B04)。

摘　　要：关于债务加入制度,我国《民法典》首次在法律上予以明确,弥补了债法制度上的立法不足,但由于该制度与连带责任保证具有盖然的相似性且在实践中存在第三人做出的意思表示模糊不清,从而给法律适用带来极大的困难。因此,在对二者联系与区分进行分析的前提下,对第三人的意思表示进行详细的制度解释,在穷极意思表示解释的前提下,适用“存疑推定为担保”的标准,从而实现对二者的有效区分。With regard to the system of debt joining,the Civil Code of China has made it clear for the fi rst time in law,which makes up for the legislative defi ciencies in the system of debt law.However,great diffi culties have been brought to the application of the law due to the similarity between the system and joint and several liability guarantee,together with the ambiguity of the third party’s intention in practice.Therefore,this paper analyzes the relationship and distinction between the two,explains in detail the third party’s declaration of intention,and puts forward the standard of presumption of doubt as guarantee should be applied on the premise of extreme interpretation of declaration of intention,so as to realize the eff ective distinction between the two.

关 键 词：民法典 债务加入 连带责任保证 意思自治 存疑推定 

分 类 号：D920[政治法律—法学]