学术期刊“三审制”视域下各责任主体伦理困境成因及破解路径  

Causes and Solutions of Each Responsible Subject’s Ethical Dilemma from the Perspective of“Three-Review System”of Academic Journals

作　　者：赵春[1] Zhao Chun(Editorial Department of Journal;Changshu Institute of Technology,Changshu 215500,China)

机构地区：[1]《常熟理工学院学报》编辑部,江苏常熟215500

出　　处：《黑河学院学报》2024年第7期80-83,共4页Journal of Heihe University

基　　金：全国高等学校文科学报研究会2021年度编辑学课题“学术期刊‘三审制’视域下各责任主体伦理困境及规避”(PY2021056);江苏省期刊协会2021年度期刊出版研究课题“学术期刊‘三审制’视域下各责任主体伦理困境及规避”(2021JSQKB02)。

摘　　要：“编辑初审、专家复审、主编终审”是学术期刊“三审制”的基本规定程序,每个环节的责任主体均面临一定的伦理困境,即初审编辑对稿件及作者的心里异化,复审专家在决定权方面的异化,终审专家在政治、人性方面的异化等。异化的成因复杂,主体伦理及学术导向均占有相当比例,应加强编辑自律与他律,实现期刊的规范性。The basic procedures regarding the“three-review system”for academic journals involves“first review by editors,re-review by experts and fi nal review by chief editors”.The responsible subject of each link faces certain ethical dilemmas,that is,the psychological alienation of the fi rst-review editor to the manuscript and the author,the alienation of the re-review expert in the decision-making power,and the alienation of the fi nal-review expert in politics and human nature.The causes of alienation are complex in terms of subject ethics and academic orientation,so we should strengthen editorial self-discipline and heteronomy to realize the standardization of journals.

关 键 词：学术期刊 三审制 伦理困境 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学]