论数字化时代的社会公权力及数字立法范式转变  

On Social Public Power in the Digital Era and Conversion of Digital Legislative Paradigm

作　　者：马忠法[1] 赵鹤翔 Ma Zhongfa;Zhao Hexiang(Law School,Fudan University,Shanghai 200438,China)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学法学院,上海200438

出　　处：《科技与法律（中英文）》2024年第4期20-29,共10页Science Technology and Law（Chinese-English Version）

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“构建人类命运共同体国际法治创新研究”(18ZDA153)。

摘　　要：自创生系统论指出,社会公权力具有主体的社会性、内容的公共性、来源的事实性,并为数字立法范式转变提供了理论基础。数字化时代社会公权力具有利维坦式权力风险,数据在其形成过程中具有决定性作用。数字化时代社会公权力的本质在于数据成为形构数字社会的基本构成要素。通过风险探究与本质考察发现,除具备工业化时代社会公权力的一般特质外,数字化时代社会公权力还具有权力产生上的数据化,权力表现形式上的场域化、多元化、去中心化,权力运行方式上的监视性与规训性之特点。对数字化时代社会公权力的规制还是要回到自创生系统论的思路,根据其上述特点,推动数字立法范式的转变。Autopoietic systems theory points out that social public power has the social nature of the subject,the public nature of the content,and the factual nature of the source,and provides a theoretical basis for the paradigm shift in digital legislation.In the digital age,social public power has the risk of Leviathan power,and data plays a decisive role in its formation.The essence of social public power in the digital era is that data has become the basic component of the digital society.Through risk exploration and essence inspection,it is found that in addition to the general characteristics of social public power in the industrialization era,social public power in the digital era also has the digitization of power generation,and the fieldization,diversification,and decentralization of power expressions.The supervisory and disciplinary characteristics of the way power is exercised.The regulation of social public power in the digital era still needs to return to the idea of autopoietic systems theory,and based on its above characteristics,promote the transformation of the digital legislative paradigm.

关 键 词：数字权力 社会公权力 数据 立法范式 自创生系统论 

分 类 号：D922[政治法律—法学]