理论尚未终结:从“跨大西洋辩论”到“跨太平洋对话”  

Theoretical End Not Yet Come:From“Transatlantic Debate”to“Transpacific Dialogue”

作　　者：袁正清[1,2] 谷翔宇 Yuan Zhengqing;Gu Xiangyu(the School of International Politics and Economics,the University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences;the Institute of World Economics and Politics,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院大学国际政治经济学院,北京100732 [2]中国社会科学院世界经济与政治研究所

出　　处：《世界经济与政治》2024年第6期3-39,156,157,共39页World Economics and Politics

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(项目批准号:20VMG006)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：十年前,西方国际关系学界认为国际关系宏大理论已经终结。但这只是跨大西洋两岸辩论范式的终结,它遮蔽了世界其他地区国际关系理论的发展。当今的国际关系理论正在经历知识生产的文化地理迁徙,开启了从“跨大西洋辩论”到“跨太平洋对话”的“奥德赛之旅”。来自中西方两种文明背景下的学者围绕“关系”在本体论、认识论和方法论层面展开了对话。这种对话超越了西方单一文明背景下范式之间的辩论以及“哥伦布式”国际关系学知识生产模式,蕴含了不同文明与多元文化交流互鉴下的“丝绸之路式”知识生产模式。“跨大西洋辩论”中西方单一文明背景下的理论终结反映了“哥伦布式”知识生产模式的不足,而“跨太平洋对话”中基于中西文明互容互鉴基础上的理论创新体现了“丝绸之路式”知识生产模式的优势。两种知识生产模式共同构成了一个更完整的国际关系知识生产空间。当然,它们并不能代表所有的国际关系理论生产模式,国际关系学面向的是一个多元多维的世界,存在着无数实践和理论的可能。“跨太平洋对话”的展开和“丝绸之路式”国际关系理论知识生产模式的出现不仅是对构建中国国际关系学科自主知识体系学术使命的呼应,而且随着“跨太平洋对话”的到来,以文明间对话为核心,国际关系理论的知识生产会在新的知识生产模式中迎来发展,国际关系理论创新也将在多元文明中得以延续。A decade ago,the Western international relations community held that the grand theory of international relations had come to an end.However,it only indicated the end of the paradigm of the transatlantic debate,which obscured the development of international relations theory in other parts of the world.Today's International Relations theories are undergoing a cultural and geographical migration of knowledge production,initiating an“odyssey”from the“transatlantic debate”to the“transpacific dialogue”.Scholars from both Chinese and Western civilizations engage in a dialogue on“relation”in ontology,epistemology,and methodology.This dialogue transcends the debate between paradigms in the context of a single Western civilization,namely a“Columbus Style”knowledge production mode,and embodies a“Silk Road Style”knowledge production mode,which grows out of the exchanges and mutual learning of different civilizations and multiculturalism.The end of theory in the“transatlantic debate”reflects the inadequacy of the“Columbus Style”knowledge production mode under the singular Western civilization background,while the theoretical innovation based on the inclusiveness and mutual learning of Chinese and Western civilizations in the“transpacific dialogue”embodies the advantages of the“Silk Road Style”knowledge production.These two modes of knowledge production together constitute a more complete space for the production of international relations knowledge.Admittedly,these two modes cannot represent all the production modes of International Relations theories,and International Relations are oriented to a diverse and multidimensional world with countless practical and theoretical possibilities.The unfolding of the“transpacific dialogue”and the emergence of the“Silk Road Style”knowledge production mode in international relations theories not only respond to the academic mission of constructing an independent knowledge system for Chinese international relations,but also,with the advent of

关 键 词：跨大西洋辩论 跨太平洋对话 关系主义 文明交流互鉴 知识生产 

分 类 号：D80[政治法律—政治学]