PUA造成严重后果的利益分析与刑事回应  

Interest Analysis and Criminal Response of PUA Resulting in Serious Consequences

作　　者：苑钟文 YUAN Zhongwen(Heilongjiang University,Harbin Heilongjiang 150006)

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学,黑龙江哈尔滨150006

出　　处：《浙江万里学院学报》2024年第4期44-49,共6页Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University

摘　　要：以曾经轰动一时的北大包某案为开端,PUA(Pick-up Artist)走进了社会公众的视线。由于PUA行为造成严重后果之难定性、难入罪和难取证的特点,司法理论与社会期待之间产生了矛盾。为解决这一问题,以利益法学的理念对PUA行为的行为逻辑进行阶段化分析,能够得到PUA行为造成严重后果不仅损害了被害人的权益,也对社会秩序产生了一定的冲击的结论,这一结论可以为PUA行为造成严重后果提供新的归责思路。在这基础上,对PUA造成严重后果行为的定性进行讨论,可以发现故意杀人论存在矛盾之处,以教唆自杀对这一行为进行定性较为合适。Starting from the well-known case at Peking University,the behavior of“Pick-up Artists”or“PUA”has gained public attention.Due to the difficulty in characterizing,incriminating and obtaining evidence against PUA behavior,it has created a conflict between judicial theories and social expectations.In order to address this issue,a phased analysis of PUA behavioral logic based on the concept of interest jurisprudence can conclude that the serious consequences caused by PUA behavior not only damage the rights and interests of victims but also have a significant impact on social order.This conclusion can provide a new way of attributing responsibility to the serious consequences caused by PUA behavior.Moreover,a discussion on the characterization of the serious consequences caused by PUA behavior can reveal contradictions in the theory of intentional homicide,and it is more appropriate to classify this behavior as instigating suicide.

关 键 词：PUA 利益法学 教唆自杀罪 

分 类 号：D924.34[政治法律—刑法学]