检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘玉芹 杨明莹[2] 王留芳[1] 夏斯亚 李丹娜[1] 赵喜娟 王娅 LIU Yuqin;YANG Mingying;WANG Liufang;XIA Siya;LI Danna;ZHAO Xijuan;WANG Ya(Dept.of Urology,The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming Yunnan 650101;Dept.of Nursing,The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming Yunnan 650101;Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery,Qujing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Qujing Yunnan 655000;Dept.of Oncology,The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming Yunnan 650101,China;Dept.of Thyroid Gland Breast Surgery,The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming Yunnan 650101,China)
机构地区:[1]昆明医科大学第二附属医院泌尿外科,云南昆明650101 [2]昆明医科大学第二附属医院护理部,云南昆明650101 [3]曲靖市中医医院脊柱微创外科,云南曲靖655000 [4]昆明医科大学第二附属医院肿瘤科,云南昆明650101 [5]昆明医科大学第二附属医院甲乳外科,云南昆明650101
出 处:《昆明医科大学学报》2024年第7期183-190,共8页Journal of Kunming Medical University
基 金:云南省科技厅科技计划项目(202301AY070001-223);云南省医学领军人才培养项目(L-2019008)。
摘 要:目的编制基于我国国情的膀胱癌患者报告结局量表,并检验其信效度。方法以莱温的守恒模式为理论指导,通过文献回顾、半结构式访谈、认知测试、2轮德尔菲专家咨询形成初量表。采用便利抽样法选取2021年7月至11月云南省3所三级甲等医院门诊或住院部的313名膀胱癌患者进行调查,对量表进行项目分析并检验其信效度。结果最终形成的膀胱癌患者报告结局量表由4个领域、11个维度、54个条目构成。对量表的4个领域分别进行探索性因子分析,分别提取出4、2、2、3个公因子,累计方差贡献率均大于50%;量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.950,分半信度系数为0.831;各条目的内容效度指数在0.833~1.000之间,量表的平均S-CVI为0.996,量表全体一致S-CVI为0.982。结论膀胱癌患者报告结局量表具有良好的信效度,可用于我国膀胱癌患者报告结局的评估,为临床医护人员实施治疗决策及精准护理干预提供参考依据,以期改善患者健康结局。Objective To develop a patient-reported outcome scale for bladder cancer suitable for Chinese culture and test its reliability and validity.Methods The initial scale was formed by literature review,semistructured interview,cognitive test,and two rounds of Delphi expert consultation guided by Levin's conservation model.A total of 313 bladder cancer patients from the outpatient or inpatient departments of three tertiary care hospitals in Yunnan Province from July to November 2021 were selected by convenience sampling to investigate the scale for item analysis and reliability testing.Results The final patient-reported outcome scale for bladder cancer consisted of 4 domains,11 dimensions,and 54 items.Exploratory factor analysis was performed on the four domains of the scale,and four,two,two,and three common factors were extracted,respectively,and the cumulative variance contribution rates were greater than 50%;the Cronbach’sαcoefficient of the total scale was 0.950 and the split-half reliability coefficient was 0.831;the content validity index of each item of the scale ranged from 0.833 to 1.000,the average content validity index of the scale was 0.996,and the content validity index of allconsistent scales was 0.982. Conclusion The patient-reported outcome scale for bladder cancer has goodreliability and can be used to evaluate the patient-reported outcome of bladder cancer in China, providing areference for clinical medical staff to implement treatment decisions and precise nursing interventions to improvepatient health outcomes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15