高校二级院系评价中的现实矛盾与治理路径——基于合法性的视角  

The Realistic Contradictions and Governance Paths in the Evaluation of Secondary Departments in Universities from the Perspectives of Legitimacy

作　　者：姜尚峰 JIANG Shangfeng

机构地区：[1]中央财经大学发展规划处,北京100081

出　　处：《中国人民大学教育学刊》2024年第3期32-43,共12页Renmin University of China Education Journal

摘　　要：高校二级院系评价是深化校院两级管理体制改革,加快推进内部治理体系和治理能力现代化的关键环节,一方面要符合外部制度环境的合法性要求,另一方面应符合内部技术环境与组织成员的期待。内部合法性的失衡会导致制度设计与实践效果存在一定的偏差,并体现为评价主体与客体之间、量化评价与综合评价之间、资源配置与目标绩效之间的矛盾。矛盾的治理应统一价值共识,构建多元协商的评价机制;明确院系为本,探索实施融合评价方法;优化资源配置,保障目标绩效与院系发展的动态平衡。通过重构二级院系评价的内部合法性,提高院系层面的认同度,保证评价的科学性、专业性、客观性。The evaluation of secondary departments in universities is a key link in deepening the reform of the twolevel university management system and accelerating the modernization of internal governance systems and governance capabilities.On the one hand,it must meet the legitimacy requirements of the external institutional environment.On the other hand,it should meet the internal technical environment and expectations of organizational members.The imbalance of the internal legitimacy will lead to a certain deviation between the system design and the practical effect,which is reflected in the contradictions between the evaluation subject and the object,between the quantitative evaluation and the comprehensive evaluation,and between the resource allocation and the target performance.The governance of conflicts should unify value consensus and construct evaluation mechanism of multiple consultation;clarify the collegebased orientation and explore and implement integrated evaluation;and optimize the allocation of resources to ensure the dynamic balance between target performance and the development of departments.By reconstructing the internal legitimacy of the evaluation of secondary departments,the degree of recognition at the level of departments can be improved to ensure the scientific,professional,and objective evaluation.

关 键 词：二级院系评价 合法性 现实矛盾 治理路径 

分 类 号：G647[文化科学—高等教育学]