从分歧到共识:欧美数据跨境流动合作的逻辑  

From Divergence to Consensus:The Logic of Cooperation in Crossborder Data Flows between Europe and the U.S.

作　　者：韩关锋 Han Guanfeng(School of Criminal Justice,China University of Political Science and Law)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院

出　　处：《国际关系研究》2024年第3期135-154,159,共21页Journal of International Relations

摘　　要：在数据治理规则日益碎片化的国际趋势下,欧盟和美国拥有二十多年的数据跨境传输经验,体现出双方在弥合数据保护鸿沟方面采取的努力。本文通过对欧美数据跨境流动的三次合作经历进行总结,归纳出双方在价值考量、规制路径和责任分配方面所遵循的逻辑共性。欧美数据治理在价值理念和制度体系方面存在的“深层次”差异并不妨碍它们进行“浅层次”的合作,原因在于双方均认可对立统一的价值角力、内外结合的双重规制、控权授权的责任平衡。我国在与“一带一路”沿线国家开展跨境数据合作时,应转变过度强调数据流动保护的理念、慎重考虑政府参与监管的方式、塑造良好的外在形象。In the international trend of increasingly fragmented governance rules in the data field,the European Union and the United States have over 20 years of experience in cross-border data transmission,reflecting the strategies and efforts taken by both sides to bridge the data protection gap.By summarizing the three cooperation experiences of cross-border data flows between Europe and the U.S.,this paper summarizes the logical commonalities followed by both parties in terms of value considerations,regulatory paths,and allocation of responsibilities.The deep-seated differences in value concepts and institutional systems in data governance between Europe and the U.S.do not hinder their cooperation at a superficial level.The reason is that both sides recognize the value considerations of opposing unity,the regulatory path of internal and external integration,and the logic of responsibility allocation for authorization and control.When carrying out cross-border data cooperation with countries along the the Belt and Road Initiatives,China should change the concept of protection of data flows,carefully consider the way of government participation in regulation,and shape a good external intelligence image.

关 键 词：数据跨境流动 价值考量 规制路径 责任分配 合作逻辑 

分 类 号：D871[政治法律—政治学]