检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄森林[1] Huang Senlin(Neijiang Normal University,Neijiang 641100)
机构地区:[1]内江师范学院,内江641100
出 处:《西部学刊》2024年第13期114-117,126,共5页Journal of Western
基 金:2022年度内江师范学院校级科研项目“成渝双城经济圈视域下法院调解制度的法经济学研究”(编号:2022YB08)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:当前,我国社会主义法治建设趋于规范,但司法资源的相对紧缺性和纠纷解决机制多元化使得包含当事人在内的普通民众开始关注并比较法院调解和审判的经济性。从法经济学的维度,通过审视法院调解的作用与法院判决的经济性差异,对比二者的预期、调解成本及调解的触发机制,提出调整当事人预期、明晰审判成本、拓展调解辅助因素等优化调解的措施,以期从法经济学的角度引导法院进行科学调解。Currently,China’s socialist rule of law construction is becoming increasingly standardized,but the relative scarcity of judicial resources and the diversification of dispute resolution mechanisms have led ordinary people,including parties,to pay attention to and compare the economic benefits of court mediation and trial.From the perspective of law and economics,by examining the economic differences between the role of court mediation and court judgments,comparing their expectations,mediation costs,and mediation triggering mechanisms,we propose measures to optimize mediation by adjusting the expectations of parties,clarifying trial costs,and expanding mediation auxiliary factors.From the perspective of law and economics,we guide courts to conduct scientific mediation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63