《简·爱》中的恩惠叙事  

Narrative of Patronage in Jane Eyre

作　　者：杨玉萍 Yang Yuping

机构地区：[1]上海外国语大学

出　　处：《英美文学研究论丛》2024年第1期135-146,共12页English and American Literary Studies

基　　金：上海外国语大学第五届导师学术引领计划项目“后人文主义转向下的人-动物问题及其文学表征”(2022113035)资助。

摘　　要：夏洛蒂·勃朗特的《简·爱》曾被贴上“叛逆的女权主义”标签,但成年之后的简·爱所做出的一系列选择又昭示出她的叛逆是不完全的。本文从恩惠关系的角度切入,结合小说的历史文化背景,探究简·爱抗拒恩惠的反“家长制”叙事话语、接受恩惠并实现阶级跃升的过程,以及成为恩主后的家庭与殖民伦理选择,指出简·爱既有叛逆的一面,又有保守和利己的一面,她并非一个“叛逆的女权主义”者,而是受益于父权秩序与殖民暴力的务实主义者。《简·爱》既客观地再现了维多利亚时期的女性在恩惠关系中的挣扎,又暴露出该时代的女性为了受益于恩惠关系而对父权秩序和殖民暴行做出的臣服姿态。Although Charlotte Brontë's Jane Eyre was once labelled as“rebellious feminism”,the adult Jane's series of choices indicate that Jane's rebellion was not complete.From the aspect of patronage,combined with the novel's historical and cultural background,this essay aims to analyze Jane's anti-paternalism narrative discourse,the process of how Jane accepts patronage and realizes a class promotion,and Jane's family and colonial ethical choice after being a benefactress.This essay points out that Jane Eyre has her rebellious side as well as her conservative and practical side,and that Jane is a pragmatist who benefits much from patriarchy and colonial violence,rather than a“rebellious feminist”.On the one hand,Jane Eyre represents Victorian women's struggle in patronage.On the other hand,it exposes how they submit to patriarchy and colonial violence in order to benefit from patronage.

关 键 词：《简·爱》 恩惠 反“家长制” 父权秩序 殖民 

分 类 号：I561.074[文学—其他各国文学]