桐城派与《史记·货殖列传》评论传统  

The Tongcheng Group and the Commentary Tradition of Records of the Grand Historian·Biographies of Merchandise

作　　者：刘金杰 LIU Jinjie(College of Literature,Anhui University,Hefei 230039,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽大学文学院,安徽合肥230039

出　　处：《宿州教育学院学报》2024年第3期99-105,共7页Journal of Suzhou Education Institute

摘　　要：《史记·货殖列传》作为阐述太史公经济思想的名篇,历代以来一直被文人群体广泛讨论,有着一个源远流长的评论传统。明清两代评论最为集中,内容主要为评价货殖及当世经济和“义利之辩”这两方面。在此传统上,方以智、戴名世的评论又开新路,桐城三祖与《货殖列传》均存在着不同程度的关系。直至后期,桐城派采取经世致用思想,借货殖来评论时局,则又是一变。总而言之,货殖评论反映了《史记》的古文传统,体现了桐城派的传承与变革,饱含着古文家关心时事的热忱。The Records of the Grand Historian·Biographies of the Merchant Colony,as a famous piece that elaborates on the economic thoughts of the Tai Shi Gong,has been widely discussed by the literati community throughout history,and therefore has a long-standing tradition of commentary.The comments of the Ming and Qing dynasties were the most concentrated,mainly focusing on the evaluation of commodity colonization and the current economy,as well as the debate on justice and profit.In this tradition,the comments of Fang Yizhi and Dai Mingshi have opened up new avenues,and there is a varying degree of relationship between the Three Ancestors of Tongcheng and the Biographies of Mer-chandise.Until the later stage,the Tongcheng School adopted a pragmatic approach and used commodity cultivation to comment on the current situation,which was another change.In summary,the comments on commodity colonization reflect the ancient literary tradition of the Records of the Grand Historian,reflect the inheritance and transformation of the Tongcheng School,and embody the enthusiasm of ancient writers to care about current affairs.

关 键 词：桐城派 《货殖列传》 评论传统 

分 类 号：I207.6[文学—中国文学]