党群逻辑与基层治理型回应——基于桥镇群众走访的研究  

Party Logic and Grassroots Government Governance-Based Responses—A Study of Mass Visits in Qiao Town

作　　者：陈伟[1] Chen Wei(Nanjing University,Nanjing Jiangsu 210023)

机构地区：[1]南京大学,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《天津行政学院学报》2024年第4期22-32,共11页Journal of Tianjin Administration Institute

摘　　要：在提升政府回应性的过程中,以公众满意率为核心指标的行政型回应模式面临着回应性悖论。基于此,桥镇通过群众走访的机制创新,主动回应群众诉求,塑造了一套以政治伦理和政治压力为内核,以干部联组和党委政府统筹为路径的治理型回应模式。这一模式的逻辑是,党委政府通过责任包干,激活干部内在的责任—情感动力;赋予干部自主空间,弹性回应群众诉求;借助政治统合和群众动员,重塑群众诉求的公共性和政治性。区别于跨层级的行政型回应模式,治理型回应模式在基层治理场域内完成对群众诉求的识别、分类及回应,具有主动性、整体性、低制度化等特点。在政府回应“弱政治化”的背景下,重拾群众路线对提升基层治理绩效和体制合法性具有重要意义。In the process of improving the responsiveness of the government,the administrative response mode,which takes the public satisfaction rate as the core index,faces the paradox of responsiveness.In this case,Qiao Town has taken the initiative to respond to people’s demands through the mechanism innovation of massive visits,which has shaped a governance-oriented response model with political ethics and political pressure as the core,and with the coordination of cadres’joint groups and the party committee government.The logic of this model is that the Party committee and government activate the internal responsibility-emotional motivation of cadres through the responsibility package,give cadres the autonomy to flexibly respond to people’s demands,and reshape the public and political nature of people’s demands with the help of political unification and mass mobilization.Different from the cross-level administrative response model,the governance model identifies,classifies,and responds to demands within the grassroots governance field,and is characterized by its proactivity,holistic nature,and low institutionalization.In the context of“weak politicization”of government responsiveness,regaining the mass line is of great significance in enhancing the performance and institutional legitimacy of grassroots governance.

关 键 词：政府回应性 行政型回应 治理型回应 群众路线 群众走访 

分 类 号：D630[政治法律—政治学]