检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋保振[1] Song Baozhen
出 处:《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2024年第4期52-67,共16页Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目(23&ZD153)“当代中国数字法学基本范畴体系研究”;山东大学人文这会科学团队创新项目“全面依法治国战略实施中的数据运用与数据治理新团队资助建设项目”。
摘 要:“数字化生活权”是在数字中国建设和数字人权保障双重背景下“互联网接入权”的理论迭代,它与“互联网接入权”在人权基础、权益范围、保障逻辑等方面有所区别。从权利证成来看,“数字化生活权”隶属公民基本权利范畴,是数字人权向具体权利转化的“二阶权利”,满足新兴权利成立的正当性、合法性与现实性标准。从权利构造来看,“数字化生活权”的权利主体主要是“数字弱势群体”,权利客体侧重于行为,权利内容包括网络连接权、网络自由权、信息公平权等具体权能。从权利实现来看,“数字化生活权”应围绕国家、互联网企业与大平台等多主体构造对应的义务谱系。就国家而言,应承担尊重、保护和给付义务,主要是提供物质与服务帮助及创造平等机会与条件。就企业与大平台而言,其义务正在经历从“道德义务”向“法律义务”转化。为保障“数字生活权”的实现,应畅通社会公众尤其是弱势群体的信息获取与使用渠道,并破解因主体身份造成的算法偏见。“Right to digital life” is a theoretical iteration of “internet access right” under background of digital China construction and Digital Human Rights protection,the two are different in human rights foundation,scope of rights and interests,and guarantee logic.From the perspective of rights establishment,“right to digital life” belongs to the category of basic rights of citizens,acts as a “second-order right” that transforms digital human rights into concrete rights,and meets the legitimacy,legitimacy and reality standards of emerging rights.From the perspective of right structure,the subject of “right to digital life” is mainly “digital vulnerable groups”,the object of right focuses on behavior,and the content of right includes the right to network connection,the right to network freedom,the right to information equity.From the perspective of rights realization,the “right to digital life” constructs the obligation pedigree around the country,Internet enterprises and large platforms.Firstly,the country has obligations of respect,protection and payment,mainly to provide material and service assistance and to create equal opportunities and conditions.As far as enterprises and large platforms,their obligations are undergoing a transformation from “moral obligations” to “legal obligations”,mainly to smooth the access and use of information by the public,especially the vulnerable groups,and to crack the algorithm bias caused by considering the identity of the subject.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112