检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:江磊 张佑印 杨丽红 李鹏鹏 JIANG Lei;ZHANG Youyin;YANG Lihong;LI Pengpeng(College of Recreation Sports and Tourism,Beijing Sport University,Beijing 100084,China;Beijing Luxun Museum,Beijing 100034,China)
机构地区:[1]北京体育大学体育休闲与旅游学院,北京100084 [2]北京鲁迅博物馆,北京100034
出 处:《世界地理研究》2024年第6期167-182,共16页World Regional Studies
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助课题(2023092)。
摘 要:青少年公共体育资源均衡合理化配置,是“十四五”时期深化青少年公共体育服务改革的重要环节,对于促进青少年群体身心健康发展具有重要现实意义。运用综合评价测度模型、探索性空间分析(ESDA)和空间杜宾模型及其偏微分分解等计量方法,对2010—2019年中国青少年公共体育资源配置水平的时空格局及空间溢出效应进行探究。结果表明:(1)全国和省际层面青少年公共体育资源配置水平总体均保持稳定上升的态势,空间上呈现“西南-东北”方向扩散递增的梯度分布格局,表现为“据点状”向“区块状”的空间演进趋势;江浙沪、京津和东北地区为高水平集聚区,中西部为低水平集聚区。(2)经济发展水平和政府支持力度对于配置水平的提升具有显著的促进作用,并呈现正向的空间溢出效应,而城镇化水平和地区生育水平存在着负向影响并表现出负向的溢出效应。The balanced and rational allocation of public sports resources for teenagers is an important part of the reform of public sports services for youth in the 14th Five-Year period(2021-2025)and is of great practical significance in promoting healthy physical and mental development for teenagers.Using the Comprehensive Evaluation Measurement Model,Exploratory Spatial Analysis(ESDA),Spatial Dubin Model and its partial differential decomposition and other measurement methods,this paper explored the spatial and temporal pattern and spatial spillover effect of the allocation level of public sports resources for teenagers in China from 2010 to 2019.The results show that:①The allocation level of public sports resources for young people at the national and provincial levels has generally maintained a steady upward trend,showing a gradient distribution pattern of"southwest northeast"direction diffusion and increase,showing a spatial evolution trend from"spot"to"block";Jiangsu,Zhejiang,Shanghai,Beijing,Tianjin and the Northeast are high-level clusters,while the central and western regions are low-level clusters.②The level of economic development and government support have a significant role in promoting the level of allocation and show a positive spatial spillover effect,while the level of urbanization and regional fertility have a negative impact and show a negative spillover effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.224.72.117