分裂主体间的范式连接:拉康镜像、话语理论视角下的《长夜行》  

The Paradigmatic Connection within the Split Subject:Journey to the End of the Night from the Perspectives of Lacanian Specular Images and Theory of Discourses

作　　者：韩之江 Han Zhijiang(School of Foreign Languages at China University of Geosciences)

机构地区：[1]中国地质大学(北京)外国语学院,北京市海淀区100083

出　　处：《文艺理论研究》2024年第2期218-226,共9页Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art

摘　　要：在国内阐释拉康的众多专著中,研究者一般倾向于将镜像理论与话语理论割裂开来单独理解、应用。但事实上,镜像理论中的光学模式第三图,与话语理论中的第四种话语——癔症话语,两者间存在隐秘联系。通过对塞利纳代表作《长夜行》这一突显主体分裂的文学化癔症话语的拉康式解读,尤其是借助学界较少关注的光学模式第三图为分析工具,本文尝试将镜像、话语两大理论范式进行连接和贯通,最终阐明二者之间的转化机制:在特定层面上,四种话语的转换矩阵实际即为光学模式翻转图的高度抽象、进化版。The Lacan studies in China have generally treated the theory of specular images and the theory of discourses as two separate areas of research.However,there exists a hidden connection between the two theories,particularly between figure Ⅲ of the optical model and the discourse of the hysteric.Louis-Ferdinand Céline's Journey to the End of the Night,as a literary example of the discourse of the hysteric,highlights the split of the subject.This paper tries to interpret the novel through a Lacanian approach,with a particular focus on the figure Ⅲ of the optical model,and hopes to bridge the gap between the theory of specular images and the theory of four discourses.The paper aims at clarifying the transformative mechanism between the two theories,and maintains that,at a certain level,the transformative matrix of the four discourses is a highly abstract and evolutionary version of the rotating figure of the optical model.

关 键 词：拉康 分裂主体 镜像 四种话语 塞利纳 《长夜行》 

分 类 号：I565.074[文学—其他各国文学]