检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱森杰 尹忞昊 袁祥州 田云[2] Zhu Senjie;Yin Minhao;Yuan Xiangzhou;Tian Yun(College of Economics and Management,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350002,Fujian,China;School of Business Administration,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,Hubei,China)
机构地区:[1]福建农林大学经济与管理学院,福州350002 [2]中南财经政法大学工商管理学院,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《中国农业资源与区划》2024年第4期42-51,共10页Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年项目“巴黎协定下中国农业碳排放权省域分配及协同减排策略研究”(71903197)。
摘 要:[目的]探究农业保险能否实现农业经济发展与碳减排“双促进”,进而提升农业碳生产率。[方法]文章基于2008—2020年中国30个省(市、区,未含香港地区、澳门地区、台湾省和西藏地区)的面板数据,构建双向固定效应模型和中介效应模型,实证检验农业保险对农业碳生产率的影响及作用机制。[结果](1)农业保险有利于提升农业碳生产率,即农业保险发展水平每提高1%,农业碳生产率平均提升0.049%。(2)从作用机制来看,农业保险通过促进农业产业集聚和农业技术进步,从而实现农业碳生产率的提升,中介效应占比分别为39.1%和24.5%。(3)进一步讨论发现,农业保险对农业碳生产率的影响存在农业产值占比的单一门槛效应,门槛值为0.012 5,当农业产值占比低于门槛值时,农业保险对农业碳生产率的作用不明显,而当农业产值占比超过门槛值时,农业保险会对农业碳生产率产生显著的促进作用。[结论]政府应从强化政策支持,提高保障水平;实行差异化补贴,推动规模化生产;完善保险条款,探索创新品种等方面进一步强化农业保险的环境正外部性。This study aims to explore whether agricultural insurance can achieve dual promotion of agricultural economic development and carbon reduction,thereby improving agricultural carbon productivity.Based on the panel data of 30 provinces,cities or autonomous regions(excluding Hong Kong region ,Macao region ,Taiwan region ,and Tibet)in China from 2008 to 2020,a two-way fixed effect model and a mediation effect model were constructed to empirically test the impact of agricultural insurance on agricultural carbon productivity and its mechanism.The results were listed as follows.(1)Agricultural insurance was conducive to improving agricultural carbon productivity,that was,with every 1%increasing in the development level of agricultural insurance,agricultural carbon productivity increased by 0.049%on average.(2)From the perspective of its mechanism,agricultural insurance improved agricultural carbon productivity by promoting agricultural industry agglomeration and agricultural technology progress,and the intermediary effect accounted for 39.1%and 24.5%respectively.(3)Further discussion found that there was a single threshold effect of the proportion of agricultural output value on the impact of agricultural insurance on agricultural carbon productivity,the threshold value was 0.0125.When the proportion of agricultural output value was lower than the threshold value, the role of agricultural insurance on agricultural carbon productivity was notobvious, while when the proportion of agricultural output value exceeded the threshold value, agricultural insurancewould have a significant role in promoting agricultural carbon productivity. Therefore, to further strengthen theenvironmental positive externalities of agricultural insurance, the government should strengthen policy support toimprove the level of security, implement differentiated subsidies to promote large-scale production, improveinsurance clauses, and explore innovative varieties.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249