虚假调解的审查判断与检察监督  

Judgement of False Mediation and Procuratorial Supervision

作　　者：赵辉 高嘉澍 Zhao Hui;Gao Jiashu

机构地区：[1]甘肃省人民检察院第六检察部 [2]甘肃省人民检察院

出　　处：《行政与法》2024年第7期108-117,共10页Administration and Law

基　　金：2023年甘肃省人民检察院创新实践课题“民事检察参与引领诚信社会新风尚路径实践”。

摘　　要：虚假调解会歪曲人民法院调解制度的价值取向,使当事人依据调解自愿原则,借用合法的民事调解程序骗取法院作出生效的调解书,继而达到逃避应当承担的法律责任、获取不正当利益的目的,严重扰乱司法秩序,损害司法权威和司法公信力,具体表现为当事人意思自治和公权力监督边界不清、检察监督缺位、调查取证难、监督方式刚性不足等,已成为当前困扰民事诉讼的突出问题。检察机关作为国家法律监督机关,通过充分发挥民事检察职能,完善和加强案件线索发现机制,强化调查核实权,对促进全社会诚信体系建设具有重要意义。False mediation can distort the value orientation of the people’s court mediation system,causing parties to use the principle of voluntary mediation to borrow legal civil mediation procedures to deceive the court into making effective mediation agreements,thereby achieving the goal of evading legal responsibilities and obtaining illegitimate benefits,seriously disrupting judicial order,damaging judicial authority and credibility,specifically manifested as unclear boundaries between party autonomy and public power supervision,lack of prosecutorial supervision,difficulty in investigation and evidence collection,and insufficient rigidity of supervision methods,which have become prominent problems currently troubling civil litigation.As a national legal supervision agency,the procuratorial organs play an important role in promoting the construction of the integrity system of the whole society by fully exerting their civil procuratorial functions,improving and strengthening the mechanism for discovering case clues,and strengthening the power of investigation and verification.

关 键 词：虚假调解 审查判断 检察监督 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]