著作权法以作者权利为中心的展开——基于《无政府、国家与乌托邦》持有正义原则的思考  

Copyright Law Concentrating on Author’s Right:A Reflection on the Principle of Justice Based on Anarchy,State and Utopia

作　　者：陈烨华 Chen Yehua(Law School and Intellectual Property School,Jinan University,Guangzhou 510632,China)

机构地区：[1]暨南大学法学院/知识产权学院,广东广州510632

出　　处：《科技创业月刊》2024年第7期171-178,共8页Journal of Entrepreneurship in Science & Technology

摘　　要：在讨论著作权法正当性问题时,激励论、人格论和劳动论存在各自的弊端,以诺齐克的持有正义原则对该问题重新进行法理阐释是一条可行路径。持有正义原则坚持过程正当的论证进路,对劳动理论进行了调整,使其适合于解释著作权法的正当性问题。基于持有正义原则的规范分析认为,作者权利的正当性源于获取正当,其他主体受让权利的正当性则源于作者权利移转的自愿性。持有正义原则的规范分析亦符合著作权历史的实然检验,著作权观念化、制度化和私法化的进程突显作者最初持有权利的正当性,也为作者权利转让和矫正提供了有力证据。基于著作权发展历史的过程正当性,著作权法不得偏离保护作者权利这一中心。When discussing the legitimacy of copyright law,the incentive theory,the personality theory and the labor theory have their own disadvantages.It is a feasible way to theoretically re-interpret the issue based on Nozick’s principle of holding justice.The principle of holding justice insists on an approach of processual legitimacy,adjusts the labor theory,which makes it applicable to the explanation of the legitimacy of copyright law.A normative analysis based on the principle of holding justice holds that the legitimacy of author’s right is derived from initial obtention,that the legitimacy of other subjects accepting rights is derived from transfer of rights made by authors based on voluntariness.Such normative analysis from the principle of holding justice also conforms to the development history of copyright law.The process of copyright idealization,institutionalization and privatization highlights the legitimacy of the author’s initial obtention of rights,and also provides strong evidence for the transfer and correction of the author’s rights.Based on the legitimacy of the process of the development of copyright history,copyright law shall not deviate from the center of protecting author’s right.

关 键 词：持有正义 作者权利 过程正当 历史检验 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]