检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘玉斌[1] 能龙阁 卜红丽 LIU Yubin;NENG Longge;BU Hongli(School of Business,Tianjin University of Finance and Economics,Tianjin 300222,China)
出 处:《南京财经大学学报》2024年第3期23-33,共11页Journal of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“新一代人工智能对中国经济高质量发展的影响、趋向及应对战略研究”(20&ZD067)。
摘 要:基于“晋升锦标赛”治理模式的特征事实,使用2003—2016年287个地级及以上城市面板数据,实证考察新旧考核模式下晋升激励对经济高质量发展的差异化影响。结果表明:(1)传统考核观下晋升激励显著阻碍了经济高质量发展,资源错配是晋升激励阻碍经济高质量发展的重要原因。(2)在资源丰富程度较低、政府财政透明度较低、年轻官员主政的城市以及直辖市中,晋升激励对经济高质量发展的负面影响更大;晋升激励对政绩存在“可视性偏差”。(3)新型考核观下晋升激励缓解了资源错配问题,促进了城市经济高质量发展,具有差异化空间溢出的特点。Based on the characteristics of the“promotion tournament”governance model,this paper uses panel data from 287 cities at the prefecture level and above from 2003 to 2016 to empirically examine the differential impact of promotion incentives on high-quality economic development under the old and new models of assessment.The results show that under the traditional assessment,promotion incentives significantly hinder high-quality economic development,with resource misallocation being an important reason for this obstruction.The negative impact is more pronounced in cities with low resource abundance,low levels of government fiscal transparency,young leadership,and municipalities directly under the central government.Additionally,promotion incentives exhibit a“visibility bias”in performance.Under the new assessment perspective,promotion incentives alleviate the problem of resource misallocation,promote high-quality economic development in cities,and display characteristics of differentiated spatial spillover.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.15.179.198