论《反垄断法》行政法律责任体系的二维扩张  

On the Two-dimensional Expansion of the Administrative Legal Liability System of"Anti-Monopoly Law"

作　　者：孙晋[1] 仝汉 SUN Jin;TONG Han(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei,430072;Suining Primary People's Court,Jiangsu Province,Xuzhou,Jiangsu,221200)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072 [2]江苏省睢宁县人民法院,江苏徐州221200

出　　处：《新疆大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第4期103-109,共7页Journal of Xinjiang University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“适应新时代市场监管需要的权力配置研究”(20&ZD194)。

摘　　要：《反垄断法》的实施为我国加速推进经济转轨创造了良好的制度环境。然而,近年来频发的垄断现象也反映出法律规范力有不逮,行政法律责任畸轻造成的威慑不足与预防效果不彰尤为明显。2022年修正的《反垄断法》试图对此予以回应,却未能提出完备的革新方案。在纵向维度上,双罚制的妥协性适用使得部分垄断行为的责任主体出现缺位;在横向维度上,处罚种类的局限性又对综合评价法律责任造成掣肘。未来可以考虑全面适用双罚制,并扩展财产罚的内涵,增加行为罚和人身罚,建构起《反垄断法》更具威慑力和灵活性的行政法律责任体系。The implementation of the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China has created favorable institutional circumstances for China to accelerate economic transformation.However,the frequent occurrence of monopoly in recent years also reflects the inadequacy of legal norms,with particularly evident deficiencies in deterrence and preventive effects due to disproportionately light administrative legal liability.While the Anti-Monopoly Law amended in 2022 attempts to address these issues,it fails to propose a comprehensive renovation plan.Vertically,the compromising application of the dual-penalty system results in the absence of responsible parties for some monopoly behaviors;horizontally,the limitations of penalty types constrain the comprehensive evaluation of legal liability.In the future,considerations could be given to comprehensively applying the dual-penalty system,expanding the connotation of property penalty,adding behavioral penalty and administrative detention,and constructing a more deterrent and flexible administrative legal liability system under the Anti-Monopoly Law.

关 键 词：《反垄断法》 行政法律责任体系 双罚制 处罚种类 法律修订 

分 类 号：D912.294[政治法律—民商法学]