和刻本《金镜内台方议》版本与特色刍议  

Discussion on Edition and Features of Japan Block-Printed Discussion on Formulas from the Inner Platform of the Golden Mirror

作　　者：林名垚 杨东方 LIN Mingyao;YANG Dongfang(School of Chinese Classics,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 102488,China)

机构地区：[1]北京中医药大学国学院,北京102488

出　　处：《山东中医药大学学报》2024年第4期494-500,共7页Journal of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

基　　金：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(编号:22FTQB012)。

摘　　要：许弘的《金镜内台方议》作为从方剂学角度研究《伤寒论》的重要著作之一,被日本所翻刻,其和刻本只有一种,即文政四年本。通过资料分析认为,《金镜内台方议》应是明末至1810年之间传入日本。因其学术价值和当时日本汉方医学发展的需求,在千田恭提议下,由丹波元胤主持翻刻。本文对早稻田大学馆藏文政四年本的版本情况进行介绍,并从保留原貌、修改明确错误、对许弘进行考证、避讳字四个方面对其特色进行论述。文政四年本具有更高的版本学价值,对《金镜内台方议》的保存和传播具有重要意义。XU Hong’s Discussion on Formulas from the Inner Platform of the Golden Mirror is one of the significant works to study Treatise on Cold Pathogenic Diseases from the perspective of Chinese formula research,which was reprinted in Japan.There should be only one Japan block-printed edition,that is,the fourth year of Wenzheng edition.Through data analysis,Discussion on Formulas from the Inner Platform of the Golden Mirror should be introduced to Japan from the late Ming Dynasty to 1810.Because of its academic value and the development requires of Chinese Medicine in Japan at that time,under the proposal of Senda Kyo,Tanba Mototane hosted the work of reprint.This paper introduced the fourth year of Wenzheng edition collected by Waseda University,and investigated the edition features in the four aspects:keeping the original appearance,modifying explicit mistakes,textual research on XU Hong,and taboo words.It was found that the fourth year of Wen-zheng edition has higher value of bibliography,and makes great significance to the preservation and dissemination of Discussion on Formulas from the Inner Platform of the Golden Mirror.

关 键 词：《金镜内台方议》 许弘 文政四年 和刻本 版本特色 丹波元胤 考证 

分 类 号：R2-5[医药卫生—中医学]