检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱腾伟 ZHU Teng-wei(School of Law and Intellectual Property,Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University,Guangzhou 510665,China)
机构地区:[1]广东技术师范大学法学与知识产权学院,广东广州510665
出 处:《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2024年第4期42-52,共11页Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:“人工智能+”行动对算法发展提出了要求,也改变了实现算法正义的衡量标准。算法正义与权利具有内在相关性,维护和发展权利是算法正义的内涵要义。算法发展应先行化解算法领域内的权利冲突,权利衡平对算法正义有重要的评判价值。目前算法应用中呈现的破坏平等、违反自由、威胁安全等正义偏离情形,其实质是因权利被剥夺、权利被侵害或侵权救济困难而引发的权利失衡。实现算法正义,应以法律构建权利衡平的规范体系、以伦理确立权利衡平的行为准则、以技术保障权利衡平的具体实施,确立三位一体的系统性算法正义实现进路,以更加契合“人工智能+”的要求。The“AI+”initiative has put forward requirements for the advancement of algorithms,and also changed the metrics for assessing the algorithmic justice.Algorithmic justice is intrinsically related to rights with the maintenance and expansion of rights serving as the essence of algorithmic justice.First and foremost,the development of algorithms should address the issue of rights conflicts within the realm of algorithms.Moreover,equitable rights hold significant value in evaluating the algorithmic justice.Currently,the disparities of justice in algorithmic applications,including the erosion of equality,infringement of freedom,and threats to security,essentially arise from the imbalance of rights resulting from the deprivation,infringement,or difficulty of obtaining redress for rights.In order to actualize the algorithmic justice,it is imperative to establish a legal normative system for right equity,develop an ethical code of conduct for right equity,and ensure the specific implementation of right equity through technological means.This three-in-one systematic approach will facilitate a more effective realization of algorithm justice,thereby better addressing the demands of the“AI+”initiative.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.220.204.192