检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曾益 Zeng Yi(Law School of Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu 610068,China University of Zurich School of Law,Zurich8006)
机构地区:[1]四川师范大学法学院,成都610068 [2]苏黎世大学法学院,苏黎世8006
出 处:《卫生法学》2024年第4期73-79,共7页Health Law
摘 要:随着医用脑机接口技术的不断发展,数据隐私问题日益凸显。脑机接口数据隐私具有自身的独特性:一方面因脑机接口直连大脑,因此数据隐私具有高度私密性;另一方面患者无法预筛、修正或删除脑机接口收集的信息,数据隐私面临更高的风险。相较于其他国家和地区,我国在脑机接口数据隐私方面的研究较为有限。为更好规制脑机接口数据隐私,有必要系统了解美国、日本、智利以及欧盟等地区的现行经验,结合我国实际情况完善相关措施,具体包括加强匿名化处理、强化第三方算法平台责任、明确神经权利法律地位和提高隐私保护意识4个方面的内容。With the continuous development of medical brain-computer interface technology,data privacy issues are becoming increasingly prominent.The data privacy of brain-computer interfaces has its own unique characteris-tics.On the one hand,as the brain-computer interface is directly connected to the brain,data privacy has a high de-gree of confidentiality;on the other hand,patients cannot pre-screen,modify,or delete the information collected by the brain-computer interface,making data privacy face higher risks.Compared with other countries and regions,re-search on brain-computer interface data privacy in China is relatively limited.In order to better regulate brain-com-puter interface data privacy,it is necessary to systematically understand the current experiences in the United States,Japan,Chile,and the European Union,and to improve relevant measures in accordance with China's actual situation.This includes strengthening anonymization processing,enhancing the responsibility of third-party algo-rithm platforms,clarifying the legal status of neural rights,and raising privacy protection awareness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.198