物权变动规则是一个解释选择吗?  

Is the Rule of Changing of Real Right a Choice of Interpretation?

作　　者：张保红 ZHANG Baohong

机构地区：[1]广东外语外贸大学法学院 [2]广东外语外贸大学阐释学研究院

出　　处：《法治研究》2024年第4期30-44,共15页Research on Rule of Law

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目(项目编号:21YJA820031)阶段性成果;广东法治研究院和阐释学研究院项目资助。

摘　　要：我国物权变动规则对债权合同与履行行为从一体把握到相互区分,最终采纳了物权形式主义。物权变动规则不是一个“解释选择”问题。物权形式主义贯彻了意思自治原则,既是物债二分的必然结果,也是非即时交易的必然规则,还是登记审查的必然要求。我国目前无论在立法还是在司法方面都确立了物权形式主义。支持债权形式主义的许多理由不能成立,诸如所有权保留等规则均能也均应通过物权行为理论解释。应当协调物权形式主义与法律行为无效制度、善意取得制度的关系,共同维护当事人的利益平衡和保障交易安全。The rule of real rights change in China comprehensively grasps and distinguishes between creditor contracts and performance acts,ultimately adopting the formalism of real rights.The rule of real rights change is not a matter of'interpretive choice'.The formalism of real rights adheres to the principle of autonomy of will,serving as both the inevitable outcome of the separation of real rights and debts and the necessary rule for non-instantaneous transactions,as well as a mandatory requirement for registration review.Currently,both in legislation and in the judiciary,China has firmly established the formalism of real rights.Many reasons supporting the formalism of debt rights can not stand,and rules such as ownership retention should be explained through the theory of real rights acts.It is necessary to coordinate the relationship between the formalism of real rights and the system of invalid legal acts,as well as the system of acquiring rights in good faith,to jointly maintain the balance of interests and ensure transaction security.

关 键 词：物权行为 区分原则 抽象原则 物权形式主义 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]