检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:海苏云 Suyun Hai(Shanghai Chongming District People’s Procuratorate,Shanghai)
机构地区:[1]上海市崇明区人民检察院,上海
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第6期3599-3604,共6页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:为解决司法实践中长期存在的“执行乱”问题,2012年修订的《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》明确授予了检察机关对民事执行活动予以监督的权力,然而因为立法对民事执行检察监督规定的模糊性,司法实践中产生了监督范围不明确、监督方式缺乏刚性、制度衔接不顺畅等等问题。本文以我国的立法现状为基础,分析我国民事执行检察监督存在的问题,并针对性提出完善建议。In order to solve the long-standing problem of“execution disorder”in judicial practice,Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China(PRC),revised in 2012,explicitly gives the procuratorial organs the power to supervise civil execution activities.However,due to the ambiguity of the legislative provisions on procuratorial supervision of civil execution,there are some problems in judicial practice,such as unclear supervision scope,lack of rigidity in supervision methods and unsmooth system connection.Based on the current legislative situation in China,this paper analyzes the problems existing in the procuratorial supervision of civil execution in China and puts forward some suggestions for improvement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.164.48