安全保障义务中的核心价值观及其司法实现  

Core Values in Security Obligation and Its Judicial Realization

作　　者：于晓菁 Xiaojing Yu(Law School,Yantai University,Yantai Shandong)

机构地区：[1]烟台大学法学院,山东烟台

出　　处：《法学（汉斯）》2024年第6期3782-3790,共9页Open Journal of Legal Science

摘　　要：在司法实践中由于安全保障制度的法律规定过于模糊,存在类案异判导致的价值失序、责任认定失准导致的价值偏离以及裁判说理简略导致的价值缺位等现象。司法裁判的形式理性倾向突出,对于核心价值观的引用存在公式化、简略化和碎片化等问题,未能很好地发挥其价值导向作用。为增强公民对裁判的可接受性度,建议在责任认定上引入动态系统论,采取“主客观相结合”的判断标准。在责任分配上根据安全保障义务类型的不同,采取“客观但有区别”的判断标准。在裁判文书的论证说理上,将核心价值观同案件事实、法律规定和法律制度结合起来,在增强公民对于司法裁判的认可度、形成正确的价值导向、将核心价值观转化为公民的情感认同与行为习惯和营造良好社会氛围等方面发挥其应有的作用。In judicial practice,because the legal provisions of the safety and security system are too vague,there are such phenomena as value disorder caused by different judgments on similar cases,value deviation caused by inaccurate determination of responsibility,and value displacement caused by abbreviated reasoning in adjudication.Judicial decisions are characterized by a tendency toward formal rationality,and the citation of core values is formulaic,abbreviated and fragmented,failing to play its value-oriented role well.In order to enhance citizens’acceptability of the decisions,it is recommended that dynamic system theory be introduced into the determination of responsibility,and that a“subjective and objective”judgment standard be adopted.For the allocation of responsibilities,the criterion of“objective but differentiated”is applied based on the different types of safety obligations.In the reasoning of judicial documents,the core values are integrated with the facts of the case,legal provisions,and legal systems to enhance the public’s acceptance of judicial judgments,establish the correct values orientation,transform core values into citizens’emotional identification and behavioral habits,and create a favorable social atmosphere,playing their due role.

关 键 词：安全保障义务 社会主义核心价值观 司法裁判 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]