检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王增冠 Zengguan Wang(School of Law(School of Public Administration),Yanshan University,Qinhuangdao Shandong)
机构地区:[1]燕山大学文法学院(公共管理学院),河北秦皇岛
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第6期3976-3982,共7页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:在我国,围绕自由心证原则,既有对其基本含义的普遍误解,也有在其应用及制约机制上的系统性和深度缺失,尤其是在民事诉讼证据认定的背景下,对该原则的具体理解尚显不足。探索在民事诉讼证据认定场景下自由心证原则应用的特定问题,重点关注如何有效制约该原则,对于丰富和深化民事诉讼法对自由心证原则的制度设计及其在实践中的应用具有重要价值。In our country,around the principle of free heart evidence,not only the general misunderstanding of its basic meaning,but also in its application and restriction mechanism of the system and depth lack,especially in the background of civil litigation evidence recognition,the specific understanding of this principle is still insufficient.It is of great value to explore the specific problems of the application of the principle of free heart evidence in the scene of evidence identification in civil proceedings,focusing on how to effectively restrict the principle,which is of great value to enrich and deepen the system design of the principle of free heart evidence in civil procedure law and its application in practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49