检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张怀营 Huaiying Zhang(School of Law,Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics,Urumqi Xinjiang)
机构地区:[1]新疆财经大学法学院,新疆乌鲁木齐
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第6期4188-4192,共5页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:本文以财政部政府采购第19号指导性案例为切入点,探讨政府采购中异常低价投标行为的危害性。我国《政府采购法》《招标投标法》《政府采购货物和服务招标投标管理办法》等法律文件虽对异常低价投标行为作了相应规定,但不足在于《政府采购货物和服务招标投标管理办法》第六十条中关于“明显低于”的标准模糊。为降低异常低价投标行为的发生概率,未来应完善“明显低于”的认定标准,加强招标文件编制的规范性,建立合理的监督制度。This article takes the Ministry of Finance’s Government Procurement Guiding Case No.19 as a starting point to explore the harmfulness of abnormally low bidding in government procurement.Although China’s“Government Procurement Law”,“Tendering and Bidding Law”,“Measures for the Administration of Bidding and Bidding for Government Procurement of Goods and Services”and other legal documents have made corresponding provisions on the behavior of abnormally low prices,the shortcomings lie in the vagueness of the standard of“significantly lower”in Article 60 of the“Measures for the Administration of Bidding and Bidding for Government Procurement of Goods and Services”.In order to reduce the probability of abnormally low bidding behavior,the identification standard of“significantly lower”should be improved in the future,the standardiza-tion of the preparation of bidding documents should be strengthened,and a reasonable supervi-sion system should be established.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49