检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈怡 Yi Chen(School of Intellectual Property,Nanjing University of Science and Technology,Nanjing Jiangsu)
机构地区:[1]南京理工大学知识产权学院,江苏南京
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第6期4222-4229,共8页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:专利间接侵权制度的立法是一个颇具争议的问题。就美国、日本和德国三国对于专利间接侵权制度的立法模式,与共同侵权和直接侵权的关系的认识上各不相同。为与国际制度保持一致,全面保护专利权人的合法利益,解决专利间接侵权司法实践的困境,我国应当对专利间接侵权制度进行专门立法,厘清其与共同侵权与专利直接侵权之间的关系,明确专利间接侵权的构成要件。Indirect infringement is a difficult and controversial issue in patent legislation.The legislative mode and the relationship between joint infringement and direct infringement are quite different in the United States,Japan and Germany.In order to maintain consistency with the international system,comprehensively protect the legitimate interests of patentees,and solve the dilemma of judicial practice of indirect patent infringement,it is necessary to carry out special legislation on the indirect patent infringement system,clarifying the relationship with the joint infringement and direct infringement of patents,and make clear the constitutive elements of indirect patent infringement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49