机构地区:[1]北京大学第一医院太原医院(太原市中心医院)心血管内科,030000
出 处:《心肺血管病杂志》2024年第6期565-570,共6页Journal of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases
基 金:太原市科技项目(202230)。
摘 要:目的:分析接受植入型心律转复除颤器(implantable cardioverter defibrillator,ICD)二级预防的缺血性心肌病(ischemic cardiomyopathy,ICM)患者复发性室性快速心律失常(ventricular tachyarrhythmia,VTA)的临床预测因素。方法:回顾性纳入我院2013年1月至2018年12月期间,接受ICD二级预防的88例ICM幸存患者。收集患者基线资料,观察患者随访5年内复发性室性心动过速(ventricular tachycardia,VT)/心室颤动(ventricular fibrillation,VF)的发生情况。结果:单因素Cox回归分析结果显示,患者随访5年时发生复发性VT/VF的影响因素包括血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞药的使用情况(HR=0.334,95%CI:0.159~0.705,P=0.004)以及左心室舒张末期容积(left ventricular end-diastolic volume,LVEDV)(HR=1.006,95%CI:1.002~1.011,P=0.006)。多因素Cox回归分析结果显示ACEI/ARB的使用情况以及LVEDV是影响患者随访5年时发生复发性VT/VF的独立临床因素(P<0.05)。LVEDV预测患者随访5年时发生复发性VT/VF的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.771(95%CI:0.672~0.869),在最佳截断值为163.5 mL。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析,LVEDV≤163.5 mL的患者随访1年(100.0%vs.76.7%,Log Rankχ^(2)=11.723,P=0.001)、3年(93.3%vs.58.1%,Log Rankχ^(2)=15.398,P<0.001)、5年(88.9%vs.46.5%,Log Rankχ^(2)=19.188,P<0.001)的无复发性VT/VF生存率明显更高。此外,57例患者在至少半年的医疗治疗后接受了随访超声心动图检查,LVEDV>163.5 mL的患者1年内复发性VTA发生率较高[LVEDV>163.5 mL vs.≤163.5 mL;37.9%(11/29)vs.7.1%(2/28);χ^(2)=7.670,P=0.006]。结论:LVEDV扩大可作为ICM患者随访5年内发生复发性VT/VF的独立预测因素。Objective:To analyze the clinical predictors of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmia(VTA)in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy(ICM)receiving secondary prevention with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator(ICD).Methods:A total of 88 ICM patients who received ICD secondary prevention in our hospital from January 2013 to December 2018 were included retrospectively.The incidence of recurrent ventricular tachycardia(VT)/ventricular fibrillation(VF)during 5 years of follow-up was observed.Results:Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that the influencing factors for recurrent VT/VF at 5 years of follow-up included the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers(B=-1.079,HR=0.334,95%CI:0.159-0.705,P=0.004)and left ventricular end-diastolic volume(LVEDV)(B=0.006,HR=1.006,95%CI:1.002-1.011,P=0.006).Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the use of ACEI/ARB and LVEDV were independent clinical factors affecting the occurrence of recurrent VT/VF at 5 years of follow-up(P<0.05).LVEDV predicted that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for recurrent VT/VF at 5 years of follow-up was 0.771(95%CI:0.672-0.869),and the optimal cut-off value was 163.5 mL.Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed that patients with LVEDV≤163.5 mL were followed up for 1 year(100.0%vs.76.7%,Log Rankχ^(2)=11.723,P=0.001)and 3 years(93.3%vs.58.1%,Log Rankχ^(2)=15.398,P<0.001)and 5-year(88.9%vs.46.5%,Log Rankχ^(2)=19.188,P<0.001)recurrence-free VT/VF survival was significantly higher.In addition,57 patients underwent follow-up echocardiography after at least six months of medical treatment.Patients with LVEDV>163.5 mL had a higher incidence of recurrent VTA within one year[LVEDV>163.5 mL vs.≤163.5 mL;37.9%(11/29)vs.7.1%(2/28);χ^(2)=7.670,P=0.006].Conclusions:LVEDV enlargement can be used as an independent predictor of recurrent VT/VF in ICM patients during 5 years of follow-up.
关 键 词:植入型心律转复除颤器 二级预防 缺血性心肌病 复发性室性快速性心律失常 左心室舒张末期容积
分 类 号:R54[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...