检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋骑 潘亚强 庄鑫 JIANG Qi;PAN Yaqiang;ZHUANG Xin(Department of Emergency,Wujin Affiliated Hospital,Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine,Changzhou 213000,CHINA)
机构地区:[1]南京中医药大学武进附属医院(常州市武进中医医院)急诊科,江苏常州213000
出 处:《江苏医药》2024年第6期622-624,共3页Jiangsu Medical Journal
摘 要:目的探讨扩展的超声创伤重点评估技术(eFAST)在多发性创伤患者胸腹部损伤筛查中的应用价值。方法58例多发性创伤胸腹部损伤患者均行CT和eFAST检查,并经过手术确诊。比较CT和eFAST检查对胸腹部损伤的检出率,分析eFAST在多发性创伤患者筛查中的应用价值。结果58例中共检出脾挫伤19例,肝挫伤14例,下腔静脉破裂10例,肠系膜上动脉破裂9例,小肠断裂6例。CT联合eFAST检查和eFAST单独检查的胸腹部损伤检出率高于CT单独检查(96.55%和94.83%vs.86.21%)(P<0.05),而eFAST单独检查与CT联合eFAST检查的胸腹部损伤检出率相仿(P>0.05)。CT检查时间长于eFAST检查[(10.87±3.41)min vs.(3.63±1.27)min](P<0.05)。结论在多发性创伤患者胸腹部损伤筛查中,采用eFAST能快速准确地评估患者病情,确定有效的救治措施,减少误诊、漏诊等情况。Objective To investigate the application value of the extended ultrasound trauma-focused assessment technique(eFAST)in the screening of thoracic and abdominal injuries in the patients with multiple trauma.Methods Fifty-eight multiple trauma patients with thoracic and abdominal injuries underwent CT and eFAST examinations,in whom the thoracic and abdominal injuries were confirmed by surgery.The detection rates of thoracic and abdominal injuries reported by CT and eFAST examination were compared.The application value of the eFAST in the screening of thoracic and abdominal injuries in the patients with multiple trauma was analyzed.Results Of 58 cases,spleen contusion was detected in 19 cases,hepatic contusion was detected in 14 cases,rupture of inferior vena cava was detected in 10 cases,rupture of superior mesenteric artery was detected in 9 cases,and rupture of small intestine was detected in 6 cases.The detection rate of CT combined with eFAST examination and eFAST alone examination for thoracic and abdominal injuries was higher than that of CT examination(96.55%and 94.83%vs.86.21%)(P<0.05).The detection rate of eFAST alone examination was similar to that of CT combined with eFAST examination(P>0.05).The time for CT examination was longer than that for eFAST examination[(10.87±3.41)min vs.(3.63±1.27)min](P<0.05).Conclusion In the screening of thoracic and abdominal injuries of multiple trauma patients,the eFAST examination can quickly and accurately evaluate the patients'condition,determine effective treatment measures,and reduce misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis.
关 键 词:扩展的超声创伤重点评估技术 多发性创伤 胸腹部损伤
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49