列宁对普列汉诺夫“工会中立”论的批判及其反思  

Lenin’s Criticism on Plekhanov’s“Neutrality of Labor Union”Theory and Its Reflection

作　　者：张春花 徐天娜 ZHANG Chunhua;XU Tianna(School of Marxism,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210023)

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学马克思主义学院,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《工会理论研究》2024年第4期53-65,共13页Labour Union Studies

基　　金：2023年国家社科基金青年项目“《共产党宣言》核心概念与中国共产党政治话语建构研究(1921—1949)”(项目编号:23CDJ052);2021年江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究思想政治工作专题项目“大学生劳动价值观的现状调查与教育对策研究”(项目编号:2021SJB0102)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：20世纪初,普列汉诺夫在俄国鼓吹“工会中立”,危害俄国工人运动的健康发展。列宁从马克思主义学说的整体精神出发,坚持历史与逻辑相统一、理论与实践相统一和具体问题具体分析的方法论,批判了普列汉诺夫主张“工会中立”的理论基础、实践依据,指明“工会中立”论以放弃革命无产阶级社会主义原则为代价,换取工会运动的团结,会导致工会与党分离,损害无产阶级革命事业发展。列宁对普列汉诺夫“工会中立”论的批判,遏制了第二国际时期“工会中立”主义在俄国的蔓延和影响,确立了党领导工会的基本原则,使工会与党团结协作,推动了俄国无产阶级革命事业的发展。At the beginning of the 20th century,Plekhanov advocated“neutrality of labor union”in Russia.It endangered the healthy development of the Russian workers’movement.Lenin insisted on starting from the overall spirit of Marxist theory,adhere to the methodology of unifying history and logic,unifying theory and practice,and analyzing specific problems,criticized Plekhanov’s theoretical and practical basis of“neutrality of labor union”.He pointed out that the“neutrality of labor union”theory would obtain the unity of the labor union movement at the cost of abandoning the principles of revolutionary proletarian socialism.It made the labor union and the party separated,and against to the struggle to promote the cause of proletarian liberation.Lenin’s criticism contained the spread and influence of labor union neutralism in Russia during the Second International,established the basic principle that the party leads the trade union,achieved the unity and cooperation between the party and the labor union,It promoted the development of the Russian proletarian revolutionary cause.

关 键 词：列宁 普列汉诺夫 工会中立 无产阶级政党 

分 类 号：D415.12[政治法律—政治学]