检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:岳树梅[1] 徐昌登 Yue Shumei;Xu Changdeng
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学国际法学院
出 处:《国际经济法学刊》2024年第2期48-64,共17页Journal of International Economic Law
基 金:2020年国家社科基金重大项目《人类命运共同体理念下我国核安全治理体系和治理能力现代化研究》(项目编号:20&ZD162);重庆市教育课题(规划项目)“推进人类命运共同体构建的国际法治体系创新研究”(项目编号:23KGH014)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:数据流动与安全已成为当前数字经济的核心议题。考虑到成员国的数字经济发展水平和历史文化差异,RCEP在跨境数据治理方面特设三类例外条款保护不发达国家的数字经济发展权。由于数字时代的国际背景、成员国的国内需求以及RCEP文本协调统一的必然性,例外条款过分强调成员国的数据主权,在法律适用上十分模糊,无法构建有效的数据区域治理机制。本文认为,需借鉴欧美数据监管模式经验,对例外条款的具体适用进行明晰,包括两个层次:RCEP例外条款的法律文本明晰与区域协调机制的完善。法律文本明晰包含分别对特定例外条款与安全例外条款进行概念与适用的厘清及数据治理中国方案的整体性明晰。区域协调机制的完善囊括构建数据联合论坛和优化争端解决机制两个层面。Data flow and security have emerged as pivotal issues in the digital economy today.Given the varied levels of digital economic development and historical-cultural differences among member states,the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership(RCEP)includes three types of exception clauses to safeguard the rights of less developed countries in digital economic growth.Owing to the international context of the digital era,the domestic needs of the members,and the necessity for coherence in the RCEP text,these exception clauses overly emphasize the data sovereignty of member states and introduce significant ambiguity in legal application,thereby hindering the establishment of an effective regional data governance framework.This paper proposes that insights from European and American data regulation models be adapted to clarify the specific application of these exception clauses.This involves two main aspects:elucidation of the legal texts concerning specific and security-related exception clauses,and enhancement of regional coordination mechanisms.The latter includes establishing a joint data forum and optimizing the dispute resolution mechanisms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15