检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐琦颖 黄德斌[1] 巫雪花 TANG Qiying;HUANG Debin;WU Xuehua(Department of Critical Care Medicine,the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University,Nanning City,Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,530021,China)
机构地区:[1]广西医科大学第一附属医院重症医学科,广西南宁530021
出 处:《蛇志》2024年第2期158-160,191,共4页Journal of Snake
摘 要:目的探讨护理专案干预对重症患者人工气道气囊压力合格率的影响。方法选择2022年2~10月在我院综合ICU留置人工气道患者574例,根据转入ICU时间先后顺序将患者分为对照组(2~5月共279例)和观察组(6~10月共295例),其中对照组给予间断测量气囊压力,观察组实施护理专案干预。比较两组人工气道气囊压力合格率。结果对照组人工气道气囊压力共871例次,合格633例次(72.68%);观察组人工气道气囊压力共1205例次,合格1130例次(93.78%);两组患者的气囊压力合格率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用护理专案干预可提高人工气道气囊压力合格率,改善护理质量。Objective To investigate the effect of nursing intervention on the qualified rate of artificial airway cuff pressure in severe patients.Methods 574 patients with artificial airway in the comprehensive ICU from February to October 2022 were divided into the control group(279 patients from February to May)and the observation group(295 patients from June to October)according to the order of time when they were transferred to the ICU.The control group was given intermittent measurement of cuff pressure,and the observation group was given nursing intervention.The pressure pass rate of the two groups was compared.Results In the control group,there were 871 cases of airbag pressure and 633 cases passed(qualified rate 72.68%);in the observation group,there were 1205 cases and 1130 cases passed(qualified rate 93.78%).The unqualified rate of airbag pressure in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of nursing intervention can effectively improve the qualified rate of artificial airway cuff pressure and promote the improvement of nursing quality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49