检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁腾飞 LIANG Tengfei(Patent Examination Cooperation Henan Center of the Patent Office,CNIPA,Zhengzhou 450046,China)
机构地区:[1]国家知识产权局专利局专利审查协作河南中心,河南郑州450046
出 处:《河南科技》2024年第12期125-130,共6页Henan Science and Technology
摘 要:【目的】加深对《专利法实施细则》必要技术特征条款的理解,为专利申请文件撰写和专利审查提供参考。【方法】以相关规定为基础,结合实际案例,梳理有关必要技术特征的一些关键问题。【结果】必要技术特征条款中的“技术问题”指的是说明书发明内容部分记载的技术问题,但在该条款的实际适用中,技术问题的认定存在一定的灵活性;必要技术特征条款与《专利法》第二十六条第四款存在竞合。【结论】在判断某一技术特征是否为必要技术特征时,不仅要考虑说明书中记载的技术问题,还需要考虑说明书的整体内容;申请人在撰写独立权利要求时,可以对技术方案进行合理概括,而不是必须包含所有的技术细节。[Purposes]The objective of this study is to deepen the understanding of the clause of essential technical features of the Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law through analysis,and to provide ref⁃erence for the drafting of patent application documents and patent examination.[Methods]Based on rel⁃evant provisions and practical cases,key problems related to essential technical features were discussed.[Findings]The"technical problem"in the clause of essential technical features refers to the technical problem disclosed in the contents of the invention part of the description,but in the practical application of the clause,there is a certain degree of flexibility in the determination of the technical problem;there is overlap between the clause of essential technical features and Article 26.4 of the Patent Law.[Conclu⁃sions]When judging whether a technical feature is an essential technical feature,it is necessary to con⁃sider not only the technical problem disclosed in the description,but also the overall content of the de⁃scription;when drafting independent claims,the applicant may reasonably summarize the technical solu⁃tion,rather than including all the technical details.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15