检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭庆祥 郑艳婷 谭雯霄 卜晓兵 赵子开 Guo Qingxiang;Zheng Yanting;Tan Wenxiao;Bu Xiaobing;Zhao Zikai(CATARC Automotive Test Center(Tianjin)Co.,Ltd.,Tianjin 300300)
机构地区:[1]中汽研汽车检验中心(天津)有限公司,天津300300
出 处:《汽车技术》2024年第7期49-54,共6页Automobile Technology
摘 要:为研究不同的数据相关性评估方法在远端乘员保护虚拟测试中的适用性,首先通过分析2个车型的远端碰撞工况基础数据,确定了11个动态响应量,进一步应用相关分析(CORA)和ISO/TS 18571方法进行相关性评估,采用误差分析法对相关性评估结果中差异较大的响应量进行分析,证明了ISO/TS 18571方法相比CORA方法所得到的评价结果更加合理。To study the applicability of different data correlation evaluation methods for virtual evaluation of far side occupant protection condition,firstly,the dynamic response of 11 simulation and test data was determined by analyzing far side occupant basic data of two vehicle models,CORrelation and Analysis(CORA)and ISO/TS 18571 methods were further applied for correlation evaluation,and error analysis method was used to analyze the response with significant differences in the correlation evaluation results,and it is concluded that ISO/TS 18571 method provides more reasonable validation results than CORA method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49