“共同刑法学”的实现路径——历史、实力、文化还是沟通共识  

Approaches to Shared Criminal Legal Theories——History,Strength,Culture or Communicative Consensus

作　　者：时延安[1,2] SHI Yan-an

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学刑事法律科学研究中心暨刑事执行检察研究中心 [2]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《上海政法学院学报（法治论丛）》2024年第4期25-39,共15页Journal of Shanghai University of Political Science & Law(The Rule of Law Forum)

摘　　要：在构建中国自主的刑法学知识体系中,如何看待并处理中国刑法学研究与域外刑法学研究的关系是一个重要问题,而促进惩治犯罪的全球性刑事法律制度形成也是中国刑法学研究的应有内容。有关惩治犯罪、可适用于各国和地区的刑法学知识可以概称为“共同刑法学”。迄今可以将不同国家推进这一知识类型的路径分为三类:“历史—实力型共同刑法学”、“历史—文化型共同刑法学”和“沟通共识型共同刑法学”。中国刑法学研究在参与并推进“共同刑法学”的历程中,应采取第三条路径,在积极加强比较刑法学的基础上,主动对接国际刑法学的发展方向,进而将中国犯罪治理的基本理念转化并融入应然的“共同刑法学”的知识体系当中。In the construction of China’s independent knowledge system of criminal theories,how to view and deal with the relationship between the study of Chinese criminal law and the study of foreign criminal law is a key issue,and promoting the formation of the global criminal theories system of crimes and penalties is also the due content of the study of Chinese criminal theories.The knowledge of criminal law about punishing crimes applied to various countries and regions can be generally called“shared criminal law”.So far,the path of different countries to promote this knowledge type can be divided into three categories:“history-strength shared criminal law”“history-culture shared criminal law”and“communication consensus shared criminal law”.The Chinese criminal law study in the process of participating and promoting“shared criminal law”,should take the third path,on the basis of strengthening comparative criminal law,to actively dock the development direction of international criminal legal theory,and thereby transforming the basic concept of Chinese crime governance and incorporating it into the should-be“shared criminal law”knowledge system.

关 键 词：共同刑法学 超国界刑法学 国际刑法学 自主知识体系 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]