论作为刑罚影响事由之间接结果的涵摄范围  

On the Permissible Range of Indirect Results that Can be Used as the Cause of Penalty Influence

作　　者：史向蓉 SHI Xiang-rong(Chinese People's Public Security University,Beijing,China,100032)

机构地区：[1]中国人民公安大学,北京100032

出　　处：《广东开放大学学报》2024年第3期44-52,共9页JOURNAL OF GUANGDONG OPEN UNIVERSITY

基　　金：中国人民公安大学2022年度基本科研业务费学科基础理论体系项目“中国传统犯罪论体系的逻辑展开”(2022JKF02053)。

摘　　要：无论在立法抑或司法中,间接结果对定罪量刑都起到不同程度的作用。然而,由于缺乏对于应当以何种标准将间接结果纳入刑罚评价范围,使其发挥定罪量刑功能,对这一关键问题的明确回答,仅仅以责任原则来限制难以对纷繁机制下的不同间接结果正确定位。通过可作为刑罚影响事由之间接结果的主客观基础的明确、不同介入因素下间接结果对原有刑罚作用程度的分析,厘清可作为刑罚影响事由的间接结果的涵摄范围,旨在阐明间接结果对刑罚量定的影响及其在法律框架内的认定标准,帮助法官在考量犯罪行为后果时建立明确的评估框架,有效避免对行为人过度惩罚或置间接结果所牵引的社会危害性于不顾的极端评价,从而提高判决的公正性和准确性。Whether in legislation or judiciary,indirect results play diff erent roles in conviction and sentencing.However,indirect results occupy an awkward position in China's criminal law system as factors infl uencing penalties,primarily due to the lack of a clear standard for their inclusion in penalty evaluation.This paper analyzes the impact of indirect results on the original penalty based on clear subjective and objective criteria and various intervening factors.By clarifying the scope of indirect results that can infl uence penalties,this study aims to elucidate their eff ect on penalty determination and the standards for their recognition within the legal framework.This will help judges establish a clear evaluation framework when considering the consequences of criminal behavior,eff ectively avoid excessive punishment or chaotic evaluation,and ultimately improve the justice and accuracy of verdicts.

关 键 词：间接结果 介入因素 因果关系 刑罚 

分 类 号：D924.13[政治法律—刑法学]