論抵觸申請抗辯的正當性與解釋方案(下)——兼論《專利法》第67條  

On Legitimacyand Interpretation of Conflicting Application Defense(Ⅱ)——Comments on Article 67 of the Patent Law

作　　者：馬妙苗 Ma Miaomiao(School of Law,East China University of Political Scienceand Law)

机构地区：[1]華東政法大學法律學院

出　　处：《中国专利与商标》2024年第3期27-38,共12页China Patents & Trademarks

摘　　要：二、《専利法》第67條规目的之探析法律漏洞,指以法律之规定計割或其整體胍铬視角,對於予规制之特定事项,法律欠缺適当的规则。2易言之,法律漏洞是一種法律“谨反計割的不圆满性”。由此,欲探究《専利法》第67條是否存在法律漏洞,须先明碓其规乾意旨。肇者将第67條的规艳目的结以下三點。Il.Probe into the normative purposes of Article 67 of the Patent Law A loophole in the law refers to inadequacy of appropriate rules in the law for specific matters that should be regulated from the perspective of the scheme or overall structure of law.22 In other words,the loophole in the law is a legal"deficiency contrary to the scheme",23 Therefore,the normative purposes of Article 67 of the Patent Law must be first clarified in order to probe into whether there exists any loophole in the law.The author summarizes the normative purposes of Article 67 as the following three points.

关 键 词：特定事项 法律漏洞 圆满性 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]