检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王正鑫 Wang Zhengxin(School of Law,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241)
出 处:《中国行政管理》2024年第6期38-46,共9页Chinese Public Administration
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“数字化行政的法律治理研究”(编号:2023BFX009);华东师范大学2023年度人文社会科学青年预研究项目“数字政府背景下的公民权利保护研究”(编号:2023ECNU-YYJ024)。
摘 要:数字技术促成监管部门的执法权力呈现智能化和自动化趋势。这主要表现为监管规则的数字化、监督守法情况的数字化以及行使制裁不守法行为的数字化。政府监管流程数字化运行可以有效提升执法质量和效能,同时也伴随着合法性风险,即数字化监管规则逃逸法律约束、数字技术反噬执法人员和监管对象的法律主体地位、技术理性压制规范理性而减损执法质量。为应对监管流程数字化运行所引发的合法性风险,需要落实算法规则与法律规则的契合性、稳固执法人员和监管对象的法律主体地位并保障数字化监管的执法质量。Digital technology promotes the digital operation of government regulatory processes,and the enforcement power of regulatory authorities is showing a trend of intelligence and automation.This is mainly manifested in the digitization of regulatory rules,the digitization of monitoring the compliance,and the digitization of sanctions for non-compliance.The digital operation of government regulatory processes can effectively improve the quality and efficiency of law enforcement,but it also comes with the risks of legitimacy,i.e.,the escape of legal constraints from digital regulatory rules,the backlash of digital technology tools on the subject status of law enforcement personnel and regulatory objects,and technical rationality suppressing normative rationality and impairing the quality of law cc.To address the legitimacy risks caused by the digital operation of regulatory processes,it is necessary to implement the compatibility between algorithm rules and legal rules,stabilize the legal status of law enforcement personnel and regulatory objects,and ensure the quality of digital supervision.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49