检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何林翀 He Linchong(School of Law,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510006,Guangdong,China)
出 处:《征信》2024年第6期18-27,共10页Credit Reference
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大研究专项(19VHJ005)。
摘 要:以垃圾信息为代表的信息治理始终是国家通信领域治理的重点方向。当前,我国在民事维权和行政执法方面不断加大对垃圾信息治理的制度供给,但治理收效甚微。基于垃圾信息对公共利益的侵蚀趋势、公益诉讼实施权配置的经济效率及其协同优势,个人信息公益诉讼成为信息治理的新路径。应当明确民事与行政公益诉讼的双重路径,激活社会组织在垃圾信息治理中的功能作用,协调公益诉讼起诉主体的诉讼顺位,并建立公益诉讼赔偿对私益损害赔偿的流动补充机制,构筑兼顾私益救济与公益保护的多主体联合治理机制。Spam governance has always been the key direction of national communication governance.At present,China has continuously increased the institutional supply of spam governance in the aspects of civil rights protection and administrative law enforcement,but the governance has little effect.Based on the erosion trend of spam to public interest,the economic efficiency of public interest litigation enforcement right allocation and its collaborative advantages,personal information public interest litigation has become a new path of spam governance.It is necessary to clarify the dual paths of civil and administrative public interest litigation,activate the functions and roles of social organizations in spam governance,coordinate the the order of the litigation rights,establish a flexible supplementary mechanism between public interest litigation compensation and individual damage compensation,and build a multi-party joint governance mechanism that gives consideration to both private interest relief and public interest protection.
分 类 号:F832[经济管理—金融学] D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7