论自动化决策中交易条件合理差别待遇的认定  

On the Determination of Reasonable Differential Treatment in Transaction Conditions within Automated Decision-Making

作　　者：朱晓峰[1] 林睿尧 Zhu Xiaofeng;Lin Ruiyao(School of Law,Central University of Finance and Economics,Beijing 100098,China)

机构地区：[1]中央财经大学法学院,北京100098

出　　处：《郑州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第3期58-67,143,共11页Journal of Zhengzhou University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社科基金后期资助项目“民法典一般人格权条款研究”(项目编号:20FFXB004)。

摘　　要：《个人信息保护法》第24条第1款规定自动化决策中禁止不合理差别待遇,确立了“合理差别待遇”的认定标准。然而,由于该认定标准自身过于抽象而不具有确定性,并且缺乏与其相适应的具体认定规则,导致其在司法实践中存在理解与适用上的困难。对此,可以考虑采取利益衡量的方法,从自动化决策信息输入、处理决策、结果输出环节出发,确定与各环节相关的利益衡量要素及其内涵,并以这些要素为基础认定各环节的合理性,最终共同作用于合理差别待遇的认定。在利益衡量方法的具体运用上,应以决策透明度、结果公平公正为判断标准,将各环节、要素与这些标准结合,查明各环节间的关系以及与认定结果之间的关系,并在此基础上将比例原则纳入利益衡量的考量机制,以此形成具有可行性的认定方法,提升合理差别待遇认定方法的明确性和可操作性。nature and lack of certainty of these criteria,coupled with the absence of specific rules for their application,there are difficulties in understanding and applying them in judicial practice.To address this,an approach based on the weighing of interests can be considered.This approach starts from the input of information in automated decision-making,the decision-making process,and the output of results,to determine the elements of interest weighing related to each stage and their connotations.These elements are then used as the basis for assessing the reasonableness of each stage,ultimately contributing to the determination of reasonable differential treatment.In the specific application of the interest weighing method,decision transparency and the fairness and justice of the results should serve as the criteria for judgment.By integrating each stage and element with these criteria,the relationships between the stages and the determination results should be clarified.On this basis,the principle of proportionality should be incorporated into the interest weighing mechanism to form a feasible method of determination,enhancing the clarity and operability of the determination method for reasonable differential treatment.

关 键 词：《个人信息保护法》第24条 算法歧视 差别待遇 大数据杀熟 比例原则 

分 类 号：D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] D923[政治法律—法学]