检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李斯嘉 侯东昱[2] LI Sijia;HOU Dongyu(Hebei University of Science and Technology,Shijiazhuang 050000,China)
机构地区:[1]河北科技大学艺术学院,河北石家庄050000 [2]河北科技大学纺织服装学院,河北石家庄050000
出 处:《西部皮革》2024年第13期123-126,共4页West Leather
摘 要:文章通过比较元代蒙古族服饰和同一时期欧洲哥特式服饰,探讨了中西方服饰文化的异同。研究显示,元代蒙古族服饰注重实用性和装饰性,颜色多用青、白、红、绿等,而欧洲哥特式服饰则灵感源自建筑艺术,追求线条的挺拔与尖锐,服装构造复杂精细。两者都利用色彩来象征身份和社会地位。在艺术上,哥特式强调线条垂直美与装饰性,而元代则注重意境的传达,仍以中国传统审美为主导。两者在服饰审美上皆融合了民族文化的特色,如蒙古族服饰适应马上生活需求,严格遵循等级制度,而哥特式服饰则深受基督教文化熏陶,追求朴素与神圣,同时也显现出贵族阶层对华丽服饰的偏好。This study examines the similarities and differences between Mongolian attire of the Yuan Dynasty and Gothic attire in contemporary medieval Europe.Mongolian attire during the Yuan Dynasty emphasized utility and ornamentation with colors such as cyan,white,red,and green,while Gothic attire in Europe drew inspiration from architectural art,emphasizing sharp lines and intricate construction.Both cultures utilized color to symbolize identity and social status.Artistically,Gothic style emphasized vertical lines and ornamentation,whereas Yuan Dynasty attire focused on conveying artistic conception,rooted in traditional Chinese aesthetics.Both integrated distinctive features of their respective cultures in attire aesthetics.For example,Mongolian attire adapted to nomadic lifestyles and hierarchical systems,while Gothic attire reflected Christian influences,striving for simplicity and sanctity,yet also showcasing aristocratic preferences for elaborate attire.
分 类 号:TS941.12[轻工技术与工程—服装设计与工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.20.233.31